proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Prudential/PGIM › 2025-2026

Prudential/PGIM proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Prudential/PGIM reported 287,646 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 197,417 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 94.2% of the time. On the 2,860 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 13.0% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

94.2% FOR of 197,417 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 186,044 AGAINST 9,604 Abstained or withheld 1,769

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

13.0% FOR of 2,860 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 2,855.

FOR 371 AGAINST 2,489 Abstained 29

See the 371 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Prudential/PGIM, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (50 inferred) 128,590 125,970 97.0% 3.0% 1,767
Director Elections Shareholders (199 inferred) 212 199 49.2% 50.8% 13
Corporate Governance Board (2 inferred) 26,735 26,630 96.5% 3.5% 10
Corporate Governance Shareholders (105 inferred) 2,058 1,966 52.1% 47.9% 5
Capital Structure Board 18,297 18,063 87.4% 12.6% 6
Capital Structure Shareholders (19 inferred) 246 246 51.6% 48.4% 0
Audit-related Board 17,964 17,959 100.0% 0.0% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (20 inferred) 22 22 100.0% 0.0% 0
Compensation Board (22 inferred) 17,459 17,318 94.2% 5.8% 6
Compensation Shareholders (18 inferred) 350 338 21.3% 78.7% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 16,405 15,216 83.0% 17.0% 2
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (26 inferred) 27 27 100.0% 0.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 877 875 91.3% 8.7% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (54 inferred) 1,372 1,305 51.3% 48.7% 16
Other Social Issues Board 668 667 97.9% 2.1% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders (42 inferred) 1,315 1,270 17.4% 82.6% 13
Environment or Climate Board 134 133 91.0% 9.0% 1
Environment or Climate Shareholders (57 inferred) 1,396 1,380 6.4% 93.6% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 1,222 1,216 98.8% 1.2% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (1 inferred) 17 17 0.0% 100.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 39 39 84.6% 15.4% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders (23 inferred) 753 723 13.7% 86.3% 16
Other Board 613 597 89.3% 10.7% 16
Other Shareholders 16 16 31.2% 68.8% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 36 36 88.9% 11.1% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders (12 inferred) 428 420 4.8% 95.2% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 11 11 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 5 5 0.0% 100.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (650 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Prudential/PGIM broke with the board (4,159 distinct proposals) →

What Prudential/PGIM said it would do

The page above is what Prudential/PGIM did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under PGIM, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Prudential/PGIM filed 287,646 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 236,459 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 5,203 issuer names and 88 funds. They cover 47,680 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
2,727 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted109 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,015 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote1,603 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Prudential/PGIM proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).