proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Prudential/PGIM › 2024-2025

Prudential/PGIM proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Prudential/PGIM reported 311,308 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 212,255 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 94.0% of the time. On the 4,087 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 16.2% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

94.0% FOR of 212,255 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 199,448 AGAINST 10,640 Abstained or withheld 2,167

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

16.2% FOR of 4,087 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 4,073.

FOR 663 AGAINST 3,424 Abstained 22

See the 663 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Prudential/PGIM, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (117 inferred) 137,600 134,538 96.2% 3.8% 2,144
Director Elections Shareholders (147 inferred) 294 240 42.5% 57.5% 54
Corporate Governance Board 30,256 30,126 96.3% 3.7% 31
Corporate Governance Shareholders (39 inferred) 1,485 1,408 34.1% 65.9% 6
Capital Structure Board 21,318 21,182 91.9% 8.1% 1
Capital Structure Shareholders 259 258 39.9% 60.1% 0
Compensation Board (40 inferred) 19,458 19,373 94.7% 5.3% 9
Compensation Shareholders (17 inferred) 859 806 35.2% 64.8% 17
Audit-related Board 19,551 19,542 99.9% 0.1% 8
Audit-related Shareholders (17 inferred) 63 63 41.3% 58.7% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 15,812 14,536 79.9% 20.1% 6
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (26 inferred) 26 25 32.0% 68.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 854 854 99.2% 0.8% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 2,034 1,938 20.8% 79.2% 10
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 1,130 1,116 94.5% 5.5% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (2 inferred) 1,052 1,023 73.9% 26.1% 0
Environment or Climate Board 233 226 100.0% 0.0% 2
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,922 1,897 6.6% 93.4% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 1,111 1,104 97.5% 2.5% 1
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 32 32 0.0% 100.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 86 86 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 1,010 966 9.8% 90.2% 12
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 80 80 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 698 655 21.7% 78.3% 0
Other Board 480 478 97.7% 2.3% 1
Other Shareholders 42 42 31.0% 69.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 24 24 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 10 10 0.0% 100.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (405 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Prudential/PGIM broke with the board (6,154 distinct proposals) →

What Prudential/PGIM said it would do

The page above is what Prudential/PGIM did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under PGIM, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Prudential/PGIM filed 311,308 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 255,857 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 8,077 issuer names and 91 funds. They cover 82,802 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
2,839 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted4 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,041 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate1 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote1,793 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Prudential/PGIM proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.