proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Prudential/PGIM › 2023-2024

Prudential/PGIM proxy voting record, 2023-2024

Prudential/PGIM reported 402,290 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 259,982 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.7% of the time. On the 7,369 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 21.0% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.7% FOR of 259,982 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 243,518 AGAINST 14,244 Abstained or withheld 2,220

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

21.0% FOR of 7,369 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 6,553.

FOR 1,544 AGAINST 5,825 Abstained 24

See the 1,544 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Prudential/PGIM, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (491 inferred) 171,033 167,671 95.7% 4.3% 2,154
Director Elections Shareholders (145 inferred) 277 170 19.4% 80.6% 103
Corporate Governance Board 38,750 38,369 95.4% 4.6% 85
Corporate Governance Shareholders (2 inferred) 2,029 1,906 47.2% 52.8% 9
Compensation Board (199 inferred) 25,040 24,779 92.4% 7.6% 59
Compensation Shareholders (6 inferred) 1,137 1,096 18.5% 81.5% 0
Capital Structure Board 25,584 25,324 91.6% 8.4% 8
Capital Structure Shareholders (8 inferred) 242 224 84.4% 15.6% 18
Audit-related Board 22,807 22,798 99.8% 0.2% 1
Audit-related Shareholders (17 inferred) 167 166 87.3% 12.7% 1
Say-on-Pay Board 19,230 16,563 81.1% 18.9% 4
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (43 inferred) 43 25 32.0% 68.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 947 943 98.6% 1.4% 2
Other Social Issues Shareholders 3,583 3,435 19.0% 81.0% 14
Environment or Climate Board 337 306 92.8% 7.2% 29
Environment or Climate Shareholders 2,612 2,510 14.6% 85.4% 5
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 1,053 1,016 91.8% 8.2% 13
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 1,146 1,082 75.8% 24.2% 3
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 105 103 100.0% 0.0% 2
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 1,731 1,667 17.0% 83.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 97 95 100.0% 0.0% 2
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 1,652 1,542 18.7% 81.3% 6
Extraordinary Transactions Board 1,416 1,411 95.5% 4.5% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 13 13 0.0% 100.0% 0
Other Board 1,305 1,273 96.0% 4.0% 27
Other Shareholders 32 32 50.0% 50.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (911 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Prudential/PGIM broke with the board (5,932 distinct proposals) →

What Prudential/PGIM said it would do

The page above is what Prudential/PGIM did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under PGIM, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Prudential/PGIM filed 402,290 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 318,100 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 5,363 issuer names and 97 funds. They cover 64,974 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
5,264 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted30 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type2,452 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote2,782 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Prudential/PGIM proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.