Merus N.V. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Appointment of Anthony Pagano as non-executive director of Merus Opportunity for Merus Shareholders to make recommendations at the EGM to Merus' non-executive directors in respect of their nomination to appoint a non-executive director

Merus N.V.’s own tally for this item (“4. Appointment of Anthony Pagano as non-executive director of the Company, which comprises two separate voting items: Proposal 4a - Opportunity for shareholders of the Company to make recommendations at the EGM to the Co”): 32,590,287 for, 8,942,977 against, per its Form 8-K filed December 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 78% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 51 asset managers below reported 4,483,057 for, 1,441,560 against, 1,289,675 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 51 asset managers. See all 51 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Appointment of Greg Mueller as non-executive director of Merus Opportunity for Merus Shareholders to make recommendations at the EGM to Merus' non-executive directors in respect of their nomination to appoint a non-executive director

Merus N.V.’s own tally for this item (“3. Appointment of Greg Mueller as non-executive director of the Company, which comprises two separate voting items: Proposal 3a - Opportunity for the shareholders of the Company to make recommendations at the EGM to the ”): 32,592,486 for, 8,926,664 against, per its Form 8-K filed December 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 78% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 42 asset managers below reported 4,434,338 for, 1,330,804 against, 69,013 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 42 asset managers. See all 42 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Appointment of Martine van Vugt, Ph.D., as non-executive director of Merus Opportunity for Merus Shareholders to make recommendations at the EGM to Merus' non-executive directors in respect of their nomination to appoint a non-executive director

Merus N.V.’s own tally for this item (“5. Appointment of Martine van Vugt, Ph.D., as non-executive director of the Company, which comprises two separate voting items: Proposal 5a - Opportunity for shareholders of the Company to make recommendations at the EGM”): 32,590,312 for, 8,941,776 against, per its Form 8-K filed December 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 78% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 42 asset managers below reported 4,434,338 for, 1,330,804 against, 69,013 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 42 asset managers. See all 42 in the interactive database.

The 34 asset managers below reported 2,638,840 for, 1,687,304 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. See all 34 in the interactive database.

The 34 asset managers below reported 2,638,840 for, 1,687,304 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. See all 34 in the interactive database.

The 34 asset managers below reported 2,638,840 for, 1,687,304 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 34 asset managers. See all 34 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Appointment of Anthony Pagano as non-executive director of Merus - Appointment of Anthony Pagano as non-executive director of Merus Anthony Pagano

The 17 asset managers below reported 2,545,487 for, 342,660 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Appointment of Greg Mueller as non-executive director of Merus - Appointment of Greg Mueller as non-executive director of Merus Greg Mueller

The 17 asset managers below reported 2,546,428 for, 341,719 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Appointment of Martine van Vugt, Ph.D., as non-executive director of Merus - Appointment of Martine van Vugt, Ph.D., as non- executive director of Merus Martine van Vugt, Ph.D.

The 17 asset managers below reported 2,546,428 for, 341,719 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: Back-End Transactions (1) To enter into a statutory merger under Dutch law pursuant to which Merus, as disappearing company, will merge with and into New Topco, as surviving company; and (2) to approve, within the meaning of Section 2:107a of the Dutch Civil Code and to the extent required by applicable law, such statutory merger and the subsequent cancellation of all class A shares in the capital of New Topco with repayment and distribution by New Topco of an amount per class A share so cancelled equal to the Offer Consideration, without interest and subject to any applicable withholding taxes

The 42 asset managers below reported 5,834,155 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 42 asset managers. See all 42 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: PROVIDED A DUTCH TAX RULING IS OBTAINED BY THE SUBSEQUENT CLOSING DATE, (1) TO ENTER INTO A STATUTORY MERGER UNDER DUTCH LAW PURSUANT TO WHICH MERUS, AS DISAPPEARING COMPANY, WILL MERGE WITH AND INTO NEW TOPCO, AS SURVIVING COMPANY; AND (2) TO APPROVE, WITHIN SECTION 2:107A OF THE DUTCH CIVIL CODE AND AS REQUIRED BY LAW, SUCH STATUTORY MERGER AND THE SUBSEQUENT CANCELLATION OF ALL CLASS A SHARES IN NEW TOPCO'S CAPITAL WITH REPAYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION BY NEW TOPCO OF AN AMOUNT PER CLASS A SHARE.

Merus N.V.’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 1b - Subject to certain conditions and provided that a certain Dutch tax ruling is not obtained ultimately on the Subsequent Closing Date, approval of a resolution (1) to amend the Company's articles of associat”): 53,548,510 for, 1,397 against, per its Form 8-K filed December 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 3 managers: 18,048 for.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 351 for.

Description as filed by funds: (1) to amend Merus' Articles of Association to increase Merus' authorized share capital in one or more tranches, and (2) to convert Merus N.V. into a private company with limited liability, promptly following the delisting of Merus' common shares from the Nasdaq Global Market and to amend Merus' Articles of Association accordingly

The 32 asset managers below reported 4,308,096 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 32 asset managers. See all 32 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Back-End Transactions - (1) to amend Menus' Articles of Association to increase Merus' authorized share capital in one or more tranches, and (2) to convert Merus N.V. into a private company with limited liability, promptly following the delisting of Merus' common shares from the Nasdaq Global Market and to amend Menus' Articles of Association accordingly

The 17 asset managers below reported 2,888,147 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: EFFECTIVE UPON THE ACCEPTANCE FOR PAYMENT BY PURCHASER FOR ALL COMMON SHARES VALIDLY TENDERED AND NOT PROPERLY WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO THE OFFER PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION TIME, TO PROVIDE FULL AND FINAL DISCHARGE TO EACH MEMBER OF THE MERUS BOARD FOR THEIR ACTS OF MANAGEMENT OR SUPERVISION, AS APPLICABLE, UP TO AND INCLUDING THE DATE OF THE EGM TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW

Merus N.V.’s own tally for this item (“2. Conditional granting of full and final discharge to each member of the Company's board of directors for their acts of management or supervision, as applicable, up to and including the date of the EGM to the fullest ex”): 53,532,377 for, 17,025 against, per its Form 8-K filed December 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 52 asset managers below reported 7,214,643 for.

Showing the 25 largest of 52 asset managers. See all 52 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Non-binding advisory proposal to approve certain compensation arrangements

Merus N.V.’s own tally for this item (“6. Approval, by means of a non-binding advisory vote, of compensation that will or may become payable to the Company's named executive officers in connection with the completion of the Offer”): 29,838,631 for, 23,527,172 against, per its Form 8-K filed December 9, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 56% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 51 managers: 2,505,817 for, 4,708,475 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 165 managers: 23,555,902 for, 17,572,876 against, 17,927 abstained, 3,058 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.