Hermes International SCA 2024-2025 Proxy Voting Records

The 72 asset managers below reported 3,356,624 for, 6,498 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 3,356,624 for, 6,498 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 3,356,624 for, 6,498 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 2,838,325 for, 524,797 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 3,017,595 for, 345,527 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 2,779,584 for, 583,538 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Appointment of Mr Bernard emie as a new member of the Supervisory Board for a term of two years, replacing Mr Alexandre Viros

The 33 asset managers below reported 1,098,282 for, 615 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 33 asset managers. See all 33 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: APPOINTMENT OF MR JEAN-LAURENT BONNAFE AS A NEW MEMBER OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD FOR A TERM OF THREE YEARS, REPLACING MS DOMINIQUE SENEQUIER

The 33 asset managers below reported 1,098,282 for, 615 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 33 asset managers. See all 33 in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 32 managers: 1,097,933 for, 508 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,703,028 for, 21 not voted.

The 72 asset managers below reported 212,783 for, 3,150,339 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approve Issuance of Equity or Equity-Linked Securities Reserved for Specific Beneficiaries, up to 10 Percent of Issued Capital

The 72 asset managers below reported 214,018 for, 3,149,104 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 214,018 for, 3,149,104 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 226,177 for, 3,136,945 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 3,363,122 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 2,088,758 for, 1,274,364 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 198,370 for, 3,164,752 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 2,079,122 for, 1,284,000 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Delegate Powers to the Management Board to Issue Shares up to 40 Percent of Issued Capital in Connection with Item 27 Above

The 72 asset managers below reported 169,794 for, 3,193,328 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: AUTHORISATION TO BE GRANTED TO THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TO REDUCE THE SHARE CAPITAL BY CANCELLATION OF ALL OR PART OF THE TREASURY SHARES HELD BY THE COMPANY (ARTICLE L. 22-10-62 OF THE FRENCH COMMERCIAL CODE (CODE DE COMMERCE)) - GENERAL CANCELLATION PROGRAMME

The 33 asset managers below reported 1,098,897 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 33 asset managers. See all 33 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 3,363,122 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 3,363,122 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 3,363,122 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 3,363,122 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

The 33 asset managers below reported 1,098,897 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 33 asset managers. See all 33 in the interactive database.

The 33 asset managers below reported 1,098,897 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 33 asset managers. See all 33 in the interactive database.

The 71 asset managers below reported 3,363,120 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 71 asset managers. See all 71 in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 70 managers: 1,533,596 for, 1,829,501 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 10 managers: 104,953 for, 144,936 against, 172 abstained.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 70 managers: 1,533,596 for, 1,829,501 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 10 managers: 103,776 for, 146,113 against, 172 abstained.

The 73 asset managers below reported 3,339,905 for, 24,394 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 73 asset managers. See all 73 in the interactive database.

The 72 asset managers below reported 3,320,162 for, 42,960 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 72 asset managers. See all 72 in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 70 managers: 3,363,097 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 9 managers: 249,951 for.

The 75 asset managers below reported 1,533,596 for, 1,832,272 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 75 asset managers. See all 75 in the interactive database.

The 75 asset managers below reported 1,492,644 for, 1,873,189 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 75 asset managers. See all 75 in the interactive database.

The 74 asset managers below reported 3,365,799 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 74 asset managers. See all 74 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVAL OF TOTAL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS OF ALL KINDS PAID DURING OR AWARDED IN RESPECT OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 31, DECEMBER 2024 TO MR AXEL DUMAS, EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN (INDIVIDUAL EX-POST VOTE)

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 32 managers: 326,583 for, 771,858 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 29 managers: 601,031 for, 1,793,499 against, 8 abstained, 24 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVAL OF TOTAL COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS OF ALL KINDS PAID DURING OR AWARDED IN RESPECT OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 31, DECEMBER 2024 TO EMILE HERMES SAS, EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN (INDIVIDUAL EX-POST VOTE)

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.