proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Fidelity › 2024-2025

Fidelity proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Fidelity reported 1,340,430 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 984,010 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.9% of the time. On the 15,358 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 7.9% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.9% FOR of 984,010 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 923,799 AGAINST 40,435 Abstained or withheld 19,776

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

7.9% FOR of 15,358 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 15,256.

FOR 1,217 AGAINST 14,141 Abstained 27

See the 1,217 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Fidelity, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (5,050 inferred) 629,244 605,040 97.0% 3.0% 19,719
Director Elections Shareholders (327 inferred) 814 474 39.5% 60.5% 289
Corporate Governance Board 149,126 148,278 92.2% 7.8% 640
Corporate Governance Shareholders (18 inferred) 11,248 11,097 36.3% 63.7% 55
Capital Structure Board (11 inferred) 99,808 99,680 92.3% 7.7% 20
Capital Structure Shareholders (8 inferred) 1,690 1,545 78.1% 21.9% 0
Audit-related Board 96,120 96,080 99.4% 0.6% 7
Audit-related Shareholders (90 inferred) 1,196 1,139 91.6% 8.4% 55
Compensation Board (1,226 inferred) 91,114 90,741 88.5% 11.5% 195
Compensation Shareholders (244 inferred) 2,973 2,951 9.2% 90.8% 0
Say-on-Pay Board (6,710 inferred) 74,927 68,438 95.1% 4.9% 1
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (93 inferred) 93 92 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 3,444 3,444 93.4% 6.6% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 9,398 9,372 7.0% 93.0% 1
Extraordinary Transactions Board 11,948 11,916 81.9% 18.1% 13
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (14 inferred) 176 176 10.8% 89.2% 0
Environment or Climate Board 1,277 1,275 100.0% 0.0% 1
Environment or Climate Shareholders 9,580 9,558 5.7% 94.3% 2
Other Board 6,209 6,143 75.5% 24.5% 61
Other Shareholders 777 776 41.2% 58.8% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 1,029 1,029 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 5,491 5,480 1.9% 98.1% 3
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 3,036 2,829 85.6% 14.4% 205
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (75 inferred) 868 864 87.2% 12.8% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 971 971 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 2,272 2,244 1.8% 98.2% 23
Investment Company Matters Board 33 25 96.0% 4.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 16 16 87.5% 12.5% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (13,866 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Fidelity broke with the board (6,122 distinct proposals) →

What Fidelity said it would do

The page above is what Fidelity did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Fidelity, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Fidelity filed 1,340,430 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 1,171,551 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 15,462 issuer names and 560 funds. They cover 172,330 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
11,853 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted83 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type6,389 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate5 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote5,376 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Fidelity proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.