Home › Upcoming votes › Coherent Corp.
Read the proxy statement on EDGARCoherent Corp.: past votes
Ballot read from the proxy statement and checked. As listed in Coherent Corp.’s proxy statement, with the board’s recommendation on each item. The company has filed 1 set of additional materials since; they can add to or change what is below, so check them before relying on it.
| # | Item | Proposed by | Board recommends | Last year (same kind of item) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ELECTION OF DIRECTORS Director election |
Board | For | — |
| 2 | NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPANY'S 2026 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION Say on pay |
Board | For | 97% support |
| 3 | RATIFICATION OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE'S SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Auditor |
Board | For | 99.0% support |
From Coherent Corp.’s Form 8-K, filed November 17, 2025, for the meeting held November 13, 2025 (read it on EDGAR). Support is the share of votes cast that were FOR: abstentions and broker non-votes are left out.
| Item | Support (of votes cast) | Reported outcome |
|---|---|---|
| David L. Motley | 99.1% | — |
| Lisa Neal-Graves | 90% | — |
| Shaker Sadasivam | 99% | — |
| Michelle Sterling | 99% | — |
| At the Annual Meeting, the Company's shareholders approved (on a non-binding advisory basis) the Company's executive compensation of named e | 97% | Approved |
| At the Annual Meeting, the Company's shareholders ratified the selection by the Audit and Risk Committee of the Company's Board of Directors | 99.0% | Approved |
The five managers that reported the most shares voted at Coherent Corp.’s November 13, 2025 meeting, from their Form N-PX filings. This is how they voted then; it says nothing about how they will vote this time. Every manager’s vote.
| Item | Fidelity | Vanguard | Invesco | BlackRock | Wellington |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At the Annual Meeting, the Company's shareholders approved (on a non-binding advisory basis) the Company's executive com | For | For | For | For | For |
| At the Annual Meeting, the Company's shareholders ratified the selection by the Audit and Risk Committee of the Company' | For | For | For | For | — |
| Election of the Class Two Directors nominated by the Board of Directors for a three-year term to expire at the annual me | For | For | For | For | — |
| Election of the Class Two Directors nominated by the Board of Directors for a three-year term to expire at the annual me | For | For | For | For | — |
| Election of the Class Two Directors nominated by the Board of Directors for a three-year term to expire at the annual me | For | For | Against | For | — |
| Election of the Class Two Directors nominated by the Board of Directors for a three-year term to expire at the annual me | For | For | For | For | — |
| Election of the Class Two Directors nominated by the Board of Directors for a three-year term to expire at the annual me | For | For | For | For | — |
The meeting facts and ballot come from the SEC proxy filings listed above. Ballots are read from the proxy statement and checked against the filing’s own text; when that check does not pass, the page shows “see the proxy statement” instead of a ballot. Last year’s figures are the company’s official Form 8-K results and the managers’ Form N-PX reports. Nothing on this page predicts how any shareholder will vote, and it is not investment advice. How this works.