proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › TIAA › 2025-2026

TIAA proxy voting record, 2025-2026

TIAA reported 334,416 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 247,260 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 89.6% of the time. On the 1,953 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 20.3% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

89.6% FOR of 247,260 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 221,487 AGAINST 17,189 Abstained or withheld 8,584

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

20.3% FOR of 1,953 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,943.

FOR 397 AGAINST 1,556 Abstained 0

See the 397 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

TIAA, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (1,729 inferred) 148,818 138,866 94.1% 5.9% 8,607
Director Elections Shareholders (18 inferred) 74 32 53.1% 46.9% 42
Corporate Governance Board 53,165 52,837 88.2% 11.8% 287
Corporate Governance Shareholders (28 inferred) 3,052 3,034 28.9% 71.1% 16
Capital Structure Board 30,460 30,447 91.3% 8.7% 1
Capital Structure Shareholders (2 inferred) 275 275 72.4% 27.6% 0
Compensation Board (421 inferred) 27,026 26,904 86.7% 13.3% 116
Compensation Shareholders (18 inferred) 250 237 40.5% 59.5% 0
Audit-related Board 24,593 24,592 99.2% 0.8% 1
Audit-related Shareholders (9 inferred) 189 175 83.4% 16.6% 14
Say-on-Pay Board (1,268 inferred) 17,501 16,158 87.1% 12.9% 4
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (10 inferred) 10 10 100.0% 0.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 4,106 4,106 74.6% 25.4% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 242 242 34.7% 65.3% 0
Other Board 2,351 2,349 75.8% 24.2% 2
Other Shareholders 288 288 58.3% 41.7% 0
Other Social Issues Board 992 992 91.1% 8.9% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,378 1,362 14.4% 85.6% 0
Environment or Climate Board 488 486 100.0% 0.0% 2
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,145 1,145 22.4% 77.6% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 427 427 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 532 532 11.3% 88.7% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 653 585 90.8% 9.2% 68
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (5 inferred) 228 228 61.0% 39.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 427 427 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 410 410 12.4% 87.6% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 25 5 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 45 45 86.7% 13.3% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (3,508 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where TIAA broke with the board (6,042 distinct proposals) →

What TIAA said it would do

The page above is what TIAA did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Nuveen TIAA, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
TIAA filed 334,416 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 305,966 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 9,050 issuer names and 57 funds. They cover 109,084 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
2,786 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted1 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,329 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote1,456 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

TIAA proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).