proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › TIAA › 2024-2025

TIAA proxy voting record, 2024-2025

TIAA reported 351,667 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 262,964 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 89.4% of the time. On the 2,669 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 24.2% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

89.4% FOR of 262,964 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 235,215 AGAINST 17,622 Abstained or withheld 10,127

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

24.2% FOR of 2,669 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 2,643.

FOR 647 AGAINST 2,022 Abstained 0

See the 647 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

TIAA, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (1,819 inferred) 162,282 150,566 94.7% 5.3% 10,180
Director Elections Shareholders (113 inferred) 176 139 31.7% 68.3% 31
Corporate Governance Board 50,217 49,918 92.6% 7.4% 256
Corporate Governance Shareholders (10 inferred) 2,792 2,787 37.9% 62.1% 4
Capital Structure Board (5 inferred) 29,822 29,815 90.8% 9.2% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 534 529 86.2% 13.8% 0
Compensation Board (451 inferred) 26,533 26,463 85.7% 14.3% 68
Compensation Shareholders (68 inferred) 629 629 27.5% 72.5% 0
Audit-related Board 26,396 26,390 99.3% 0.7% 3
Audit-related Shareholders (9 inferred) 412 408 93.1% 6.9% 4
Say-on-Pay Board (1,187 inferred) 19,389 17,801 85.1% 14.9% 1
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (10 inferred) 10 10 100.0% 0.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 4,366 4,349 81.4% 18.6% 8
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (4 inferred) 90 90 7.8% 92.2% 0
Other Social Issues Board 950 950 89.4% 10.6% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,545 1,545 15.1% 84.9% 0
Other Board 2,178 2,165 78.1% 21.9% 13
Other Shareholders 254 253 39.1% 60.9% 0
Environment or Climate Board 428 426 100.0% 0.0% 2
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,682 1,682 18.9% 81.1% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 391 391 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 959 959 11.8% 88.2% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 771 686 88.8% 11.2% 85
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (10 inferred) 163 163 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 372 372 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 382 382 17.5% 82.5% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 5 5 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 10 10 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (3,686 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where TIAA broke with the board (6,146 distinct proposals) →

What TIAA said it would do

The page above is what TIAA did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Nuveen TIAA, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
TIAA filed 351,667 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 320,572 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 14,157 issuer names and 41 funds. They cover 167,335 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
3,196 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted6 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,579 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote1,611 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

TIAA proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.