Home › Asset managers › PRAXIS FUNDS › 2025-2026

PRAXIS FUNDS proxy voting record, 2025-2026

PRAXIS FUNDS reported 24,524 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 18,982 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 80.3% of the time. On the 365 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 55.1% of the time.

2024-20252025-2026

80.3%Voted for board proposals
55.1%Backed E&S proposals
21,799Ballot items
16,170Proposals
1,408Issuers
6Funds / accounts

On the board’s own proposals

80.3% FOR of 18,982 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

80.3% FOR

FOR 15,238 AGAINST 3,019 Abstained or withheld 725

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

55.1% FOR of 365 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 363.

55.1% FOR AGAINST

FOR 201 AGAINST 164 Abstained 0

See the 201 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

PRAXIS FUNDS, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal type	Put on the ballot by	Items	Decided	Voted FOR	Voted AGAINST	Abstained / withheld
Director Elections	Board (19 inferred)	13,136	12,301	87.8%	12.2%	723
Corporate Governance	Board	1,883	1,880	93.7%	6.3%	2
Corporate Governance	Shareholders (2 inferred)	434	434	79.3%	20.7%	0
Audit-related	Board	1,841	1,841	95.1%	4.9%	0
Audit-related	Shareholders (2 inferred)	9	9	77.8%	22.2%	0
Say-on-Pay	Board	1,581	1,497	22.4%	77.6%	0
Say-on-Pay	Shareholders (2 inferred)	2	2	0.0%	100.0%	0
Compensation	Board (9 inferred)	1,397	1,395	86.6%	13.4%	2
Compensation	Shareholders	29	27	77.8%	22.2%	0
Capital Structure	Board	1,112	1,112	93.9%	6.1%	0
Capital Structure	Shareholders	18	18	94.4%	5.6%	0
Other Social Issues	Board	67	67	100.0%	0.0%	0
Other Social Issues	Shareholders	257	257	45.9%	54.1%	0
Environment or Climate	Board	41	41	92.7%	7.3%	0
Environment or Climate	Shareholders	197	197	51.3%	48.7%	0
Extraordinary Transactions	Board	151	151	91.4%	8.6%	0
Extraordinary Transactions	Shareholders	2	2	0.0%	100.0%	0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion	Board	34	34	100.0%	0.0%	0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion	Shareholders	91	91	19.8%	80.2%	0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce	Board	34	34	100.0%	0.0%	0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce	Shareholders	66	66	77.3%	22.7%	0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses	Board	38	38	97.4%	2.6%	0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses	Shareholders	43	43	60.5%	39.5%	0
Other	Board	45	45	95.6%	4.4%	0
Other	Shareholders	32	32	21.9%	78.1%	0
Investment Company Matters	Board	1	1	100.0%	0.0%	0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (34 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where PRAXIS FUNDS broke with the board (2,778 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.: PRAXIS FUNDS filed 24,524 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 21,799 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,408 issuer names and 6 funds. They cover 16,170 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.: Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.: On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
199 items are outside both headline figures.: Besides the table rows neither figure uses:

Excluded	Items	Why
Not voted	0	Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type	84	Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate	0	The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote	115	The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 18, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

PRAXIS FUNDS proxy season coverage: 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).