Home › Asset managers › PRAXIS FUNDS › 2024-2025

PRAXIS FUNDS proxy voting record, 2024-2025

PRAXIS FUNDS reported 20,153 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 15,595 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 83.5% of the time. On the 325 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 67.1% of the time.

2024-20252025-2026

83.5%Voted for board proposals
67.1%Backed E&S proposals
18,049Ballot items
16,054Proposals
1,390Issuers
6Funds / accounts

On the board’s own proposals

83.5% FOR of 15,595 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

83.5% FOR

FOR 13,015 AGAINST 2,034 Abstained or withheld 546

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

67.1% FOR of 325 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 322.

67.1% FOR AGAINST

FOR 218 AGAINST 107 Abstained 2

See the 218 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

PRAXIS FUNDS, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal type	Put on the ballot by	Items	Decided	Voted FOR	Voted AGAINST	Abstained / withheld
Director Elections	Board (42 inferred)	10,603	9,965	90.4%	9.6%	543
Director Elections	Shareholders (1 inferred)	2	2	0.0%	100.0%	0
Corporate Governance	Board	1,722	1,707	91.1%	8.9%	15
Corporate Governance	Shareholders	250	250	54.4%	45.6%	0
Audit-related	Board	1,494	1,493	95.5%	4.5%	0
Audit-related	Shareholders (1 inferred)	10	10	70.0%	30.0%	0
Compensation	Board (17 inferred)	1,329	1,323	87.2%	12.8%	5
Compensation	Shareholders (2 inferred)	56	56	71.4%	28.6%	0
Say-on-Pay	Board	1,173	1,112	30.3%	69.7%	0
Say-on-Pay	Shareholders (1 inferred)	1	1	0.0%	100.0%	0
Capital Structure	Board	1,103	1,103	93.7%	6.3%	0
Capital Structure	Shareholders	33	33	93.9%	6.1%	0
Other Social Issues	Board	69	69	100.0%	0.0%	0
Other Social Issues	Shareholders	194	192	51.0%	49.0%	2
Environment or Climate	Board	41	41	95.1%	4.9%	0
Environment or Climate	Shareholders	201	200	49.0%	51.0%	0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion	Board	38	38	100.0%	0.0%	0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion	Shareholders	123	123	30.9%	69.1%	0
Extraordinary Transactions	Board	132	132	92.4%	7.6%	0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce	Board	35	35	100.0%	0.0%	0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce	Shareholders	50	50	94.0%	6.0%	0
Other	Board	31	31	96.8%	3.2%	0
Other	Shareholders	39	39	10.3%	89.7%	0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses	Board	42	41	95.1%	4.9%	1
Shareholder Rights and Defenses	Shareholders (1 inferred)	20	20	95.0%	5.0%	0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (65 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where PRAXIS FUNDS broke with the board (2,396 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.: PRAXIS FUNDS filed 20,153 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 18,049 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,390 issuer names and 6 funds. They cover 16,054 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.: Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.: On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
159 items are outside both headline figures.: Besides the table rows neither figure uses:

Excluded	Items	Why
Not voted	0	Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type	61	Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate	0	The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote	98	The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 18, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

PRAXIS FUNDS proxy season coverage: 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.