proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Northern Trust › 2025-2026

Northern Trust proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Northern Trust reported 279,155 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 204,732 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 89.7% of the time. On the 1,311 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 31.5% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

89.7% FOR of 204,732 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 183,561 AGAINST 17,050 Abstained or withheld 4,121

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

31.5% FOR of 1,311 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,304.

FOR 413 AGAINST 898 Abstained 15

See the 413 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Northern Trust, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (1,433 inferred) 112,427 107,551 92.2% 7.8% 4,108
Director Elections Shareholders (26 inferred) 40 32 15.6% 84.4% 8
Corporate Governance Board 47,519 47,288 89.6% 10.4% 212
Corporate Governance Shareholders (28 inferred) 2,482 2,461 41.4% 58.6% 21
Capital Structure Board 27,384 27,378 92.1% 7.9% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders (3 inferred) 209 209 67.5% 32.5% 0
Compensation Board (384 inferred) 24,846 24,697 86.6% 13.4% 138
Compensation Shareholders (16 inferred) 229 222 40.5% 59.5% 2
Say-on-Pay Board 24,803 22,596 89.8% 10.2% 1
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (12 inferred) 18 18 100.0% 0.0% 0
Audit-related Board 17,395 17,395 96.7% 3.3% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (5 inferred) 184 168 78.0% 22.0% 15
Extraordinary Transactions Board 3,085 3,074 75.0% 25.0% 2
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 120 120 27.5% 72.5% 0
Other Board 2,373 2,328 71.7% 28.3% 44
Other Shareholders 349 349 45.0% 55.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 1,117 1,117 92.9% 7.1% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,021 1,003 22.3% 77.7% 10
Environment or Climate Board 606 606 97.0% 3.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 959 959 24.9% 75.1% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 495 495 99.8% 0.2% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 372 372 11.3% 88.7% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 495 495 99.8% 0.2% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 285 275 41.1% 58.9% 10
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 539 476 88.4% 11.6% 63
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (2 inferred) 132 132 63.6% 36.4% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 9 9 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 23 23 78.3% 21.7% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (1,909 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Northern Trust broke with the board (6,093 distinct proposals) →

What Northern Trust said it would do

The page above is what Northern Trust did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Northern Trust, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Northern Trust filed 279,155 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 257,349 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 13,343 issuer names and 45 funds. They cover 110,177 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
3,033 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,722 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote1,311 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Northern Trust proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).