proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Northern Trust › 2024-2025

Northern Trust proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Northern Trust reported 268,760 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 200,093 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 89.7% of the time. On the 1,806 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 38.0% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

89.7% FOR of 200,093 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 179,498 AGAINST 15,369 Abstained or withheld 5,226

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

38.0% FOR of 1,806 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,798.

FOR 687 AGAINST 1,119 Abstained 14

See the 687 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Northern Trust, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (1,604 inferred) 112,950 107,017 92.4% 7.6% 5,160
Director Elections Shareholders (100 inferred) 146 123 30.1% 69.9% 18
Corporate Governance Board 41,205 40,981 92.0% 8.0% 208
Corporate Governance Shareholders (17 inferred) 2,279 2,265 46.8% 53.2% 14
Capital Structure Board (6 inferred) 26,618 26,602 91.2% 8.8% 3
Capital Structure Shareholders 359 355 84.2% 15.8% 0
Compensation Board (397 inferred) 23,109 23,023 86.4% 13.6% 84
Compensation Shareholders (50 inferred) 442 442 41.0% 59.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 22,379 20,694 92.3% 7.7% 7
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (11 inferred) 17 17 100.0% 0.0% 0
Audit-related Board 16,895 16,885 98.7% 1.3% 4
Audit-related Shareholders (4 inferred) 367 357 89.6% 10.4% 10
Extraordinary Transactions Board 2,996 2,986 81.3% 18.7% 5
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (2 inferred) 63 63 9.5% 90.5% 0
Other Board 2,160 2,095 70.7% 29.3% 65
Other Shareholders 282 278 36.7% 63.3% 4
Other Social Issues Board 1,087 1,087 93.3% 6.7% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,194 1,191 26.2% 73.8% 3
Environment or Climate Board 555 554 98.0% 2.0% 1
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,371 1,356 26.8% 73.2% 11
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 447 447 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 660 660 16.4% 83.6% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 433 433 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 331 331 53.8% 46.2% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 568 486 86.6% 13.4% 82
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (4 inferred) 83 83 96.4% 3.6% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 7 7 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 6 6 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (2,195 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Northern Trust broke with the board (6,154 distinct proposals) →

What Northern Trust said it would do

The page above is what Northern Trust did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Northern Trust, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Northern Trust filed 268,760 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 247,342 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 13,312 issuer names and 43 funds. They cover 105,526 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
2,506 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,564 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote942 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 25, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Northern Trust proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.