proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Lattice Strategies Trust › 2023-2024

Lattice Strategies Trust proxy voting record, 2023-2024

Lattice Strategies Trust reported 35,166 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 22,989 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 91.6% of the time. On the 712 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 1.5% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

91.6% FOR of 22,989 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 21,053 AGAINST 1,416 Abstained or withheld 520

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

1.5% FOR of 712 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 628.

FOR 11 AGAINST 701 Abstained 0

See the 11 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Lattice Strategies Trust, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (130 inferred) 17,717 14,875 94.8% 5.2% 517
Director Elections Shareholders (7 inferred) 27 22 72.7% 27.3% 0
Corporate Governance Board 4,561 4,169 94.5% 5.5% 17
Corporate Governance Shareholders (1 inferred) 463 375 60.3% 39.7% 2
Compensation Board (45 inferred) 2,768 2,487 88.7% 11.3% 5
Compensation Shareholders (5 inferred) 150 127 6.3% 93.7% 0
Capital Structure Board 2,272 1,985 94.8% 5.2% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 21 16 68.8% 31.2% 0
Audit-related Board 2,241 1,935 99.4% 0.6% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (3 inferred) 40 33 90.9% 9.1% 2
Say-on-Pay Board 1,678 1,246 77.0% 23.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (6 inferred) 6 3 0.0% 100.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 115 106 89.6% 10.4% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 599 454 2.9% 97.1% 0
Environment or Climate Board 50 46 95.7% 4.3% 2
Environment or Climate Shareholders 510 412 2.2% 97.8% 0
Other Board 347 320 58.8% 41.2% 0
Other Shareholders 27 19 15.8% 84.2% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 38 36 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 258 195 3.6% 96.4% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 36 34 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 230 177 7.3% 92.7% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 147 137 90.5% 9.5% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 83 70 78.6% 21.4% 2
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 24 17 82.4% 17.6% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (197 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Lattice Strategies Trust broke with the board (1,410 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Lattice Strategies Trust filed 35,166 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 32,734 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,711 issuer names and 10 funds. They cover 20,791 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
4,377 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted4,091 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type215 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote71 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 18, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Lattice Strategies Trust proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.