proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Lattice Strategies Trust › 2025-2026

Lattice Strategies Trust proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Lattice Strategies Trust reported 24,854 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 18,974 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 92.9% of the time. On the 373 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 0.3% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

92.9% FOR of 18,974 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 17,625 AGAINST 961 Abstained or withheld 388

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

0.3% FOR of 373 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 369.

FOR 1 AGAINST 372 Abstained 0

See the 1 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Lattice Strategies Trust, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (87 inferred) 12,909 12,437 96.3% 3.7% 393
Director Elections Shareholders (5 inferred) 8 5 20.0% 80.0% 3
Corporate Governance Board 2,935 2,928 94.9% 5.1% 7
Corporate Governance Shareholders (4 inferred) 456 453 20.5% 79.5% 3
Audit-related Board 1,737 1,737 97.8% 2.2% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (4 inferred) 15 13 84.6% 15.4% 2
Compensation Board (31 inferred) 1,673 1,667 89.1% 10.9% 6
Compensation Shareholders (5 inferred) 46 44 18.2% 81.8% 0
Capital Structure Board 1,494 1,494 92.6% 7.4% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 21 21 76.2% 23.8% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 1,285 1,229 85.2% 14.8% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (4 inferred) 4 4 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 64 64 95.3% 4.7% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 250 250 0.4% 99.6% 0
Environment or Climate Board 33 33 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 204 204 0.5% 99.5% 0
Other Board 191 191 50.8% 49.2% 0
Other Shareholders 36 36 16.7% 83.3% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 170 170 77.6% 22.4% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 3 3 33.3% 66.7% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 27 27 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 99 99 0.0% 100.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 27 27 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 74 74 0.0% 100.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 48 44 84.1% 15.9% 4
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 31 31 51.6% 48.4% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (140 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Lattice Strategies Trust broke with the board (1,174 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Lattice Strategies Trust filed 24,854 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 22,907 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,433 issuer names and 7 funds. They cover 17,178 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
137 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type55 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote82 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Lattice Strategies Trust proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).