proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Lattice Strategies Trust › 2024-2025

Lattice Strategies Trust proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Lattice Strategies Trust reported 37,447 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 27,854 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 91.3% of the time. On the 677 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 2.7% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

91.3% FOR of 27,854 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 25,420 AGAINST 1,577 Abstained or withheld 857

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

2.7% FOR of 677 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 677.

FOR 18 AGAINST 659 Abstained 0

See the 18 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Lattice Strategies Trust, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (137 inferred) 19,017 17,899 95.9% 4.1% 855
Director Elections Shareholders 4 2 0.0% 100.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board 4,935 4,830 93.3% 6.7% 13
Corporate Governance Shareholders (1 inferred) 462 457 36.1% 63.9% 1
Compensation Board (42 inferred) 2,773 2,685 87.0% 13.0% 6
Compensation Shareholders (1 inferred) 112 112 2.7% 97.3% 0
Capital Structure Board 2,608 2,535 91.9% 8.1% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 65 65 81.5% 18.5% 0
Audit-related Board 2,451 2,418 99.0% 1.0% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (1 inferred) 26 23 65.2% 34.8% 1
Say-on-Pay Board 1,604 1,517 78.2% 21.8% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (1 inferred) 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 132 129 90.7% 9.3% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 423 422 4.3% 95.7% 0
Environment or Climate Board 63 62 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 465 465 3.7% 96.3% 0
Other Board 307 298 52.7% 47.3% 1
Other Shareholders 49 49 24.5% 75.5% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 53 52 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 249 249 5.2% 94.8% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 200 198 90.4% 9.6% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 50 49 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 109 109 0.0% 100.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 84 73 94.5% 5.5% 10
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (1 inferred) 25 25 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (184 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Lattice Strategies Trust broke with the board (1,690 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Lattice Strategies Trust filed 37,447 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 34,625 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,833 issuer names and 10 funds. They cover 21,868 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
630 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted459 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type76 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote95 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Lattice Strategies Trust proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.