proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Fidelity › 2025-2026

Fidelity proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Fidelity reported 1,326,013 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 974,562 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 94.1% of the time. On the 11,096 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 6.8% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

94.1% FOR of 974,562 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 916,584 AGAINST 41,353 Abstained or withheld 16,625

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

6.8% FOR of 11,096 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 11,060.

FOR 752 AGAINST 10,344 Abstained 4

See the 752 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Fidelity, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (4,744 inferred) 609,756 589,655 97.1% 2.9% 16,541
Director Elections Shareholders (141 inferred) 315 159 46.5% 53.5% 151
Corporate Governance Board (1 inferred) 158,006 157,152 90.5% 9.5% 596
Corporate Governance Shareholders (147 inferred) 14,261 13,918 25.6% 74.4% 224
Capital Structure Board 100,033 99,903 92.0% 8.0% 12
Capital Structure Shareholders (21 inferred) 1,084 1,081 67.2% 32.8% 0
Audit-related Board 96,656 96,637 98.4% 1.6% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (88 inferred) 819 745 78.5% 21.5% 73
Compensation Board (1,180 inferred) 94,648 94,260 89.0% 11.0% 210
Compensation Shareholders (82 inferred) 1,149 1,107 25.5% 74.5% 0
Say-on-Pay Board (8,679 inferred) 78,020 71,568 94.4% 5.6% 4
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (93 inferred) 93 93 100.0% 0.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 13,371 13,364 86.3% 13.7% 4
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 434 434 35.0% 65.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 3,670 3,670 92.9% 7.1% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 7,900 7,879 2.9% 97.1% 2
Other Board 7,380 7,317 72.0% 28.0% 62
Other Shareholders 1,050 1,049 54.3% 45.7% 0
Environment or Climate Board 1,488 1,485 99.7% 0.3% 3
Environment or Climate Shareholders 6,524 6,503 8.8% 91.2% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 1,148 1,148 99.7% 0.3% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 2,896 2,890 4.8% 95.2% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 2,688 2,532 89.1% 10.9% 148
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (46 inferred) 1,329 1,324 57.2% 42.8% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 1,148 1,148 99.7% 0.3% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 2,242 2,233 4.5% 95.5% 2
Investment Company Matters Board 35 34 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 90 90 94.4% 5.6% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (15,222 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Fidelity broke with the board (6,052 distinct proposals) →

What Fidelity said it would do

The page above is what Fidelity did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Fidelity, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Fidelity filed 1,326,013 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 1,165,189 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 10,522 issuer names and 406 funds. They cover 119,492 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
10,789 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted106 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type6,338 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote4,345 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Fidelity proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).