proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Fidelity › 2023-2024

Fidelity proxy voting record, 2023-2024

Fidelity reported 1,367,611 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 996,048 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.7% of the time. On the 21,754 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 12.4% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.7% FOR of 996,048 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 933,611 AGAINST 44,643 Abstained or withheld 17,794

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

12.4% FOR of 21,754 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 19,411.

FOR 2,704 AGAINST 19,050 Abstained 26

See the 2,704 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Fidelity, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (6,709 inferred) 644,741 623,576 96.6% 3.4% 17,586
Director Elections Shareholders (64 inferred) 834 443 45.4% 54.6% 390
Corporate Governance Board 159,294 158,394 89.0% 11.0% 633
Corporate Governance Shareholders (25 inferred) 12,035 11,903 42.3% 57.7% 70
Compensation Board (1,702 inferred) 98,740 98,272 86.7% 13.3% 289
Compensation Shareholders (43 inferred) 3,210 3,199 4.8% 95.2% 0
Capital Structure Board 96,344 96,218 92.2% 7.8% 15
Capital Structure Shareholders (2 inferred) 1,380 1,373 81.1% 18.9% 4
Audit-related Board 93,871 93,855 99.6% 0.4% 3
Audit-related Shareholders (47 inferred) 1,983 1,917 93.5% 6.5% 65
Say-on-Pay Board (4,394 inferred) 77,526 66,834 94.0% 6.0% 15
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (94 inferred) 94 47 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 3,144 3,143 93.2% 6.8% 1
Other Social Issues Shareholders 13,162 13,108 9.0% 91.0% 1
Environment or Climate Board 1,236 1,227 100.0% 0.0% 5
Environment or Climate Shareholders 11,008 10,946 4.6% 95.4% 24
Extraordinary Transactions Board 9,825 9,819 91.2% 8.8% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (4 inferred) 48 48 0.0% 100.0% 0
Other Board 8,879 8,792 81.0% 19.0% 82
Other Shareholders 741 739 53.6% 46.4% 2
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 869 868 100.0% 0.0% 1
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 6,100 6,078 12.9% 87.1% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 793 792 100.0% 0.0% 1
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 5,322 5,299 6.9% 93.1% 1
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 3,108 2,898 88.5% 11.5% 181
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 691 664 78.8% 21.2% 5
Investment Company Matters Board 9 8 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (13,084 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Fidelity broke with the board (6,125 distinct proposals) →

What Fidelity said it would do

The page above is what Fidelity did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Fidelity, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Fidelity filed 1,367,611 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 1,204,703 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 11,067 issuer names and 658 funds. They cover 124,599 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
15,105 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted154 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type10,644 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate3 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote4,304 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Fidelity proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.