proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Empower › 2025-2026

Empower proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Empower reported 86,358 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 64,282 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 94.5% of the time. On the 519 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 7.9% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

94.5% FOR of 64,282 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 60,718 AGAINST 2,774 Abstained or withheld 790

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

7.9% FOR of 519 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 517.

FOR 41 AGAINST 478 Abstained 0

See the 41 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Empower, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (252 inferred) 46,924 42,572 96.4% 3.6% 778
Director Elections Shareholders (6 inferred) 13 8 25.0% 75.0% 3
Corporate Governance Board (1 inferred) 8,990 6,615 93.8% 6.2% 13
Corporate Governance Shareholders (5 inferred) 637 584 33.9% 66.1% 2
Compensation Board (20 inferred) 6,862 6,169 89.1% 10.9% 12
Compensation Shareholders 75 75 25.3% 74.7% 0
Capital Structure Board 5,941 5,484 96.1% 3.9% 10
Capital Structure Shareholders (2 inferred) 64 62 50.0% 50.0% 0
Audit-related Board (10 inferred) 5,651 5,139 98.7% 1.3% 0
Audit-related Shareholders 58 54 50.0% 50.0% 2
Say-on-Pay Board (6 inferred) 4,609 3,930 90.2% 9.8% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders 3 3 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Board 578 433 88.7% 11.3% 0
Other Shareholders 31 30 20.0% 80.0% 1
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board (1 inferred) 427 378 92.3% 7.7% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (1 inferred) 176 168 76.8% 23.2% 1
Other Social Issues Board 233 229 99.6% 0.4% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 335 319 8.8% 91.2% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 500 455 92.5% 7.5% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (3 inferred) 3 3 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Board 60 58 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 332 291 6.2% 93.8% 2
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 107 107 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 79 76 5.3% 94.7% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 24 24 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 105 105 0.0% 100.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 18 11 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 4 4 0.0% 100.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (307 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Empower broke with the board (2,529 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Empower filed 86,358 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 82,158 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,488 issuer names and 37 funds. They cover 43,610 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
8,618 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted8,159 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type213 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate79 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote167 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Empower proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).