proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Empower › 2024-2025

Empower proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Empower reported 87,342 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 65,018 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.0% of the time. On the 791 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 15.3% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.0% FOR of 65,018 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 60,436 AGAINST 3,579 Abstained or withheld 1,003

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

15.3% FOR of 791 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 788.

FOR 121 AGAINST 670 Abstained 0

See the 121 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Empower, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (217 inferred) 46,399 41,782 95.6% 4.4% 983
Director Elections Shareholders (16 inferred) 60 42 69.0% 31.0% 12
Corporate Governance Board (1 inferred) 8,546 6,449 93.6% 6.4% 23
Corporate Governance Shareholders (4 inferred) 535 503 30.8% 69.2% 2
Compensation Board (9 inferred) 7,042 6,381 87.6% 12.4% 8
Compensation Shareholders (2 inferred) 210 205 35.6% 64.4% 0
Capital Structure Board 6,677 6,235 93.9% 6.1% 14
Capital Structure Shareholders 67 58 53.4% 46.6% 0
Audit-related Board 5,810 5,329 97.5% 2.5% 5
Audit-related Shareholders 28 26 61.5% 38.5% 2
Say-on-Pay Board (40 inferred) 4,674 4,069 88.1% 11.9% 4
Say-on-Pay Shareholders 5 5 40.0% 60.0% 0
Other Board 984 832 88.8% 11.2% 11
Other Shareholders 31 30 13.3% 86.7% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 461 452 95.8% 4.2% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (3 inferred) 215 205 71.7% 28.3% 0
Other Social Issues Board 260 254 98.8% 1.2% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 349 325 17.2% 82.8% 0
Environment or Climate Board 72 67 91.0% 9.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 471 443 12.0% 88.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 457 431 92.6% 7.4% 1
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (1 inferred) 12 12 8.3% 91.7% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 30 28 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 197 193 8.8% 91.2% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 31 27 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 143 136 8.1% 91.9% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (293 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Empower broke with the board (3,138 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Empower filed 87,342 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 82,915 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,451 issuer names and 21 funds. They cover 45,196 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
8,149 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted7,644 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type213 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate64 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote228 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Empower proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.