proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › DWS › 2025-2026

DWS proxy voting record, 2025-2026

DWS reported 275,770 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 200,577 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 91.4% of the time. On the 2,251 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 31.1% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

91.4% FOR of 200,577 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 183,334 AGAINST 14,672 Abstained or withheld 2,571

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

31.1% FOR of 2,251 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 2,242.

FOR 700 AGAINST 1,551 Abstained 0

See the 700 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

DWS, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (1,804 inferred) 117,106 113,969 95.2% 4.8% 2,542
Director Elections Shareholders (22 inferred) 26 22 22.7% 77.3% 4
Corporate Governance Board 49,786 49,431 86.4% 13.6% 332
Corporate Governance Shareholders (31 inferred) 3,375 3,360 58.9% 41.1% 13
Capital Structure Board 29,454 29,427 92.5% 7.5% 22
Capital Structure Shareholders (7 inferred) 248 248 83.1% 16.9% 0
Compensation Board (456 inferred) 25,729 25,618 83.1% 16.9% 102
Compensation Shareholders (22 inferred) 314 300 43.7% 56.3% 0
Audit-related Board 17,739 17,725 97.3% 2.7% 14
Audit-related Shareholders (15 inferred) 215 209 72.7% 27.3% 6
Say-on-Pay Board (2,000 inferred) 11,332 10,584 85.7% 14.3% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (16 inferred) 16 16 100.0% 0.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 3,269 3,268 68.1% 31.9% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 178 178 18.0% 82.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 1,099 1,099 93.2% 6.8% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,627 1,627 39.9% 60.1% 0
Other Board 1,950 1,930 77.0% 23.0% 20
Other Shareholders 372 372 45.7% 54.3% 0
Environment or Climate Board 626 626 99.8% 0.2% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,355 1,355 14.6% 85.4% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 508 508 99.8% 0.2% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 589 589 8.3% 91.7% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 508 508 99.8% 0.2% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 470 470 41.1% 58.9% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 527 494 88.9% 11.1% 33
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (1 inferred) 225 225 59.6% 40.4% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 10 10 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 32 32 93.8% 6.2% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (4,374 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where DWS broke with the board (6,056 distinct proposals) →

What DWS said it would do

The page above is what DWS did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under DWS, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
DWS filed 275,770 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 256,084 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 6,602 issuer names and 82 funds. They cover 79,402 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
1,397 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type745 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote652 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

DWS proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).