proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › DWS › 2023-2024

DWS proxy voting record, 2023-2024

DWS reported 302,377 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 215,447 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 91.3% of the time. On the 4,299 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 65.1% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

91.3% FOR of 215,447 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 196,679 AGAINST 15,404 Abstained or withheld 3,364

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

65.1% FOR of 4,299 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 3,767.

FOR 2,799 AGAINST 1,500 Abstained 5

See the 2,799 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

DWS, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (2,961 inferred) 126,204 122,475 94.8% 5.2% 3,256
Director Elections Shareholders (18 inferred) 161 73 63.0% 37.0% 88
Corporate Governance Board 57,490 57,041 88.1% 11.9% 412
Corporate Governance Shareholders (27 inferred) 3,371 3,364 69.8% 30.2% 7
Capital Structure Board (1 inferred) 32,986 32,962 91.1% 8.9% 22
Capital Structure Shareholders 418 418 95.0% 5.0% 0
Compensation Board (729 inferred) 29,909 29,817 82.6% 17.4% 86
Compensation Shareholders (13 inferred) 748 748 37.6% 62.4% 0
Audit-related Board 17,400 17,393 99.2% 0.8% 7
Audit-related Shareholders (11 inferred) 913 906 94.2% 5.8% 7
Say-on-Pay Board (2,110 inferred) 12,017 10,467 89.6% 10.4% 2
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (24 inferred) 24 12 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Board 3,531 3,520 84.7% 15.3% 11
Other Shareholders 332 332 63.6% 36.4% 0
Other Social Issues Board 1,152 1,152 92.4% 7.6% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 2,707 2,707 54.3% 45.7% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 3,202 3,193 85.8% 14.2% 9
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 4 4 0.0% 100.0% 0
Environment or Climate Board 612 596 96.1% 3.9% 16
Environment or Climate Shareholders 2,223 2,223 52.2% 47.8% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 472 472 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 1,182 1,177 45.1% 54.9% 5
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 452 452 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 1,000 1,000 72.6% 27.4% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 625 560 88.2% 11.8% 63
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 125 123 83.7% 16.3% 0
Uncategorized Board 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (5,894 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where DWS broke with the board (6,272 distinct proposals) →

What DWS said it would do

The page above is what DWS did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under DWS, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
DWS filed 302,377 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 282,597 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 6,562 issuer names and 82 funds. They cover 79,652 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
2,082 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,559 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote523 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

DWS proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.