proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Calvert › 2025-2026

Calvert proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Calvert reported 102,646 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 79,586 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 65.8% of the time. On the 794 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 54.2% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

65.8% FOR of 79,586 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 52,382 AGAINST 22,179 Abstained or withheld 5,025

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

54.2% FOR of 794 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 787.

FOR 430 AGAINST 364 Abstained 0

See the 430 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Calvert, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (177 inferred) 51,060 44,768 67.2% 32.8% 5,039
Director Elections Shareholders (6 inferred) 10 6 0.0% 100.0% 4
Corporate Governance Board 10,782 10,730 90.8% 9.2% 39
Corporate Governance Shareholders (14 inferred) 1,209 1,189 75.4% 24.6% 19
Say-on-Pay Board (2,860 inferred) 9,008 8,322 28.7% 71.3% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (8 inferred) 8 8 0.0% 100.0% 0
Audit-related Board 7,985 7,984 98.4% 1.6% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (7 inferred) 67 67 71.6% 28.4% 0
Compensation Board (51 inferred) 7,159 7,148 82.1% 17.9% 10
Compensation Shareholders (6 inferred) 65 59 33.9% 66.1% 0
Capital Structure Board 5,923 5,919 95.8% 4.2% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders (2 inferred) 51 51 70.6% 29.4% 0
Other Social Issues Board 337 337 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 556 554 41.9% 58.1% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 678 678 92.9% 7.1% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 9 9 0.0% 100.0% 0
Environment or Climate Board 202 202 98.0% 2.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 467 467 48.4% 51.6% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 170 170 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 214 214 19.2% 80.8% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 170 170 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 140 140 69.3% 30.7% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 195 194 84.0% 16.0% 1
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (4 inferred) 92 92 62.0% 38.0% 0
Other Board 169 169 61.5% 38.5% 0
Other Shareholders 87 87 26.4% 73.6% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 6 6 83.3% 16.7% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (3,135 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Calvert broke with the board (6,102 distinct proposals) →

What Calvert said it would do

The page above is what Calvert did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Calvert, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Calvert filed 102,646 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 93,700 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,235 issuer names and 29 funds. They cover 43,781 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
1,964 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type667 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote1,297 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Calvert proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).