proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Calvert › 2024-2025

Calvert proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Calvert reported 103,728 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 79,963 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 68.7% of the time. On the 1,103 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 69.0% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

68.7% FOR of 79,963 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 54,943 AGAINST 20,312 Abstained or withheld 4,708

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

69.0% FOR of 1,103 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,094.

FOR 761 AGAINST 342 Abstained 0

See the 761 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Calvert, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (168 inferred) 51,671 45,864 72.6% 27.4% 4,691
Director Elections Shareholders (2 inferred) 13 10 60.0% 40.0% 2
Corporate Governance Board 10,841 10,796 92.5% 7.5% 40
Corporate Governance Shareholders (6 inferred) 979 965 60.1% 39.9% 14
Say-on-Pay Board (2,795 inferred) 8,883 8,192 32.8% 67.2% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (8 inferred) 8 8 100.0% 0.0% 0
Audit-related Board 8,091 8,075 94.7% 5.3% 13
Audit-related Shareholders (7 inferred) 50 50 78.0% 22.0% 0
Compensation Board (39 inferred) 6,949 6,938 77.5% 22.5% 4
Compensation Shareholders (9 inferred) 227 227 74.0% 26.0% 0
Capital Structure Board 5,996 5,996 94.3% 5.7% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 60 60 83.3% 16.7% 0
Other Social Issues Board 329 329 99.7% 0.3% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 620 620 45.0% 55.0% 0
Environment or Climate Board 189 189 94.7% 5.3% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 660 654 51.4% 48.6% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 160 160 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 388 388 34.3% 65.7% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 463 462 90.9% 9.1% 1
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (1 inferred) 3 3 33.3% 66.7% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 158 158 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 173 173 90.8% 9.2% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 214 208 87.0% 13.0% 6
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (4 inferred) 64 64 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Board 152 152 73.7% 26.3% 0
Other Shareholders 89 89 21.3% 78.7% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (3,039 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Calvert broke with the board (6,175 distinct proposals) →

What Calvert said it would do

The page above is what Calvert did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Calvert, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Calvert filed 103,728 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 94,565 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,229 issuer names and 33 funds. They cover 43,723 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
1,829 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type684 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote1,145 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Calvert proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.