proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Brighthouse › 2024-2025

Brighthouse proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Brighthouse reported 298,164 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 218,594 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 78.0% of the time. On the 1,677 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 14.6% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

78.0% FOR of 218,594 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 170,425 AGAINST 12,260 Abstained or withheld 35,909

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

14.6% FOR of 1,677 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,661.

FOR 245 AGAINST 1,432 Abstained 1,667

See the 245 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Brighthouse, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (558 inferred) 146,768 115,880 95.3% 4.7% 28,104
Director Elections Shareholders (16 inferred) 164 43 51.2% 48.8% 80
Corporate Governance Board (6 inferred) 31,868 25,282 93.2% 6.8% 1,070
Corporate Governance Shareholders (20 inferred) 2,054 1,869 45.9% 54.1% 155
Compensation Board (88 inferred) 21,778 19,901 82.1% 17.9% 722
Compensation Shareholders (14 inferred) 694 510 33.3% 66.7% 183
Audit-related Board (27 inferred) 21,596 17,311 97.8% 2.2% 3,478
Audit-related Shareholders (10 inferred) 162 146 80.8% 19.2% 14
Capital Structure Board (2 inferred) 19,829 18,489 90.1% 9.9% 155
Capital Structure Shareholders 270 225 60.4% 39.6% 38
Say-on-Pay Board 14,803 10,510 88.5% 11.5% 3,436
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (10 inferred) 10 4 75.0% 25.0% 6
Other Board 2,796 1,380 65.1% 34.9% 16
Other Shareholders (1 inferred) 313 310 20.3% 79.7% 1
Other Social Issues Board 832 716 99.4% 0.6% 81
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,607 866 12.6% 87.4% 733
Environment or Climate Board 367 262 97.3% 2.7% 98
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,618 918 9.7% 90.3% 690
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 973 873 85.5% 14.5% 51
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (4 inferred) 626 279 73.8% 26.2% 342
Extraordinary Transactions Board 1,426 1,375 93.6% 6.4% 29
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (1 inferred) 59 59 89.8% 10.2% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 274 193 100.0% 0.0% 77
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 931 515 6.6% 93.4% 410
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 275 194 100.0% 0.0% 77
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 573 304 11.5% 88.5% 267
Investment Company Matters Board 8 8 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 2 2 50.0% 50.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (757 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Brighthouse broke with the board (6,137 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Brighthouse filed 298,164 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 266,941 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 10,779 issuer names and 88 funds. They cover 131,766 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
13,850 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted12,205 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type863 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate1 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote781 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Brighthouse proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.