proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Brighthouse › 2025-2026

Brighthouse proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Brighthouse reported 274,652 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 204,324 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 76.3% of the time. On the 1,182 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 12.8% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

76.3% FOR of 204,324 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 155,852 AGAINST 11,957 Abstained or withheld 36,515

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

12.8% FOR of 1,182 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,179.

FOR 151 AGAINST 1,031 Abstained 1,177

See the 151 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Brighthouse, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (1,082 inferred) 136,358 106,569 94.6% 5.4% 27,944
Director Elections Shareholders (22 inferred) 54 21 52.4% 47.6% 18
Corporate Governance Board (34 inferred) 28,957 22,805 93.4% 6.6% 1,628
Corporate Governance Shareholders (34 inferred) 2,848 2,395 52.7% 47.3% 392
Compensation Board (104 inferred) 19,745 18,178 82.1% 17.9% 895
Compensation Shareholders 473 381 69.3% 30.7% 84
Audit-related Board (40 inferred) 19,987 15,858 96.6% 3.4% 3,737
Audit-related Shareholders (12 inferred) 207 194 82.0% 18.0% 9
Capital Structure Board 17,526 16,751 91.7% 8.3% 275
Capital Structure Shareholders (8 inferred) 493 455 84.2% 15.8% 34
Say-on-Pay Board 14,141 10,205 87.9% 12.1% 3,667
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (12 inferred) 17 11 90.9% 9.1% 6
Other Board (25 inferred) 2,754 1,332 56.4% 43.6% 78
Other Shareholders (5 inferred) 305 263 22.4% 77.6% 7
Other Social Issues Board 770 671 99.4% 0.6% 90
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,254 706 12.9% 87.1% 543
Extraordinary Transactions Board 1,581 1,523 93.3% 6.7% 32
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 32 26 65.4% 34.6% 4
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 816 734 82.4% 17.6% 75
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (8 inferred) 753 335 63.0% 37.0% 417
Environment or Climate Board 333 228 96.5% 3.5% 97
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,182 661 10.3% 89.7% 510
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 265 178 100.0% 0.0% 83
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 562 301 13.6% 86.4% 260
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 265 178 100.0% 0.0% 83
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 471 255 6.3% 93.7% 214
Investment Company Matters Board 497 12 100.0% 0.0% 8
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 3 3 33.3% 66.7% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (1,386 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Brighthouse broke with the board (6,088 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Brighthouse filed 274,652 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 247,563 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 8,562 issuer names and 79 funds. They cover 104,992 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
10,121 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted8,718 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type238 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote1,165 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Brighthouse proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).