proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Brighthouse › 2023-2024

Brighthouse proxy voting record, 2023-2024

Brighthouse reported 284,656 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 210,501 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 76.9% of the time. On the 2,064 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 23.9% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

76.9% FOR of 210,501 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 161,773 AGAINST 12,119 Abstained or withheld 36,609

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

23.9% FOR of 2,064 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,862.

FOR 493 AGAINST 1,571 Abstained 2,704

See the 493 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Brighthouse, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (528 inferred) 144,682 113,279 95.0% 5.0% 28,782
Director Elections Shareholders (16 inferred) 168 39 33.3% 66.7% 61
Corporate Governance Board (33 inferred) 26,678 20,995 90.8% 9.2% 1,258
Corporate Governance Shareholders (17 inferred) 1,770 1,488 54.5% 45.5% 228
Compensation Board (140 inferred) 21,944 20,024 81.5% 18.5% 675
Compensation Shareholders (5 inferred) 697 466 28.8% 71.2% 221
Audit-related Board (32 inferred) 20,065 16,093 97.8% 2.2% 3,367
Audit-related Shareholders (9 inferred) 167 160 82.5% 17.5% 5
Capital Structure Board 15,593 14,290 89.8% 10.2% 155
Capital Structure Shareholders (1 inferred) 172 144 81.2% 18.8% 25
Say-on-Pay Board 15,165 10,006 87.9% 12.1% 3,626
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (18 inferred) 18 7 71.4% 28.6% 4
Other Board 10,657 8,780 86.9% 13.1% 83
Other Shareholders (5 inferred) 77 60 28.3% 71.7% 3
Other Social Issues Board 717 624 98.2% 1.8% 75
Other Social Issues Shareholders (3 inferred) 2,390 1,094 20.4% 79.6% 1,274
Environment or Climate Board 382 274 96.0% 4.0% 102
Environment or Climate Shareholders (2 inferred) 1,761 852 19.0% 81.0% 903
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 301 227 100.0% 0.0% 71
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 1,112 489 17.0% 83.0% 618
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 295 221 100.0% 0.0% 71
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders (2 inferred) 1,085 474 22.2% 77.8% 608
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 755 666 86.8% 13.2% 49
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (4 inferred) 624 258 75.6% 24.4% 360
Extraordinary Transactions Board 1,151 1,105 91.2% 8.8% 12
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (1 inferred) 15 12 0.0% 100.0% 3

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (816 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Brighthouse broke with the board (6,278 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Brighthouse filed 284,656 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 260,940 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 8,247 issuer names and 73 funds. They cover 108,502 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
13,412 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted11,029 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,621 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote762 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Brighthouse proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.