proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › BlackRock › 2025-2026

BlackRock proxy voting record, 2025-2026

BlackRock reported 1,757,643 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 1,355,861 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.6% of the time. On the 6,306 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 5.5% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.6% FOR of 1,355,861 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 1,269,180 AGAINST 68,168 Abstained or withheld 18,513

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

5.5% FOR of 6,306 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 6,262.

FOR 349 AGAINST 5,957 Abstained 0

See the 349 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

BlackRock, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (308 inferred) 786,935 766,951 96.7% 3.3% 16,938
Director Elections Shareholders (946 inferred) 946 937 28.5% 71.5% 9
Corporate Governance Board (49 inferred) 190,620 182,601 90.8% 9.2% 7,050
Corporate Governance Shareholders (286 inferred) 15,225 14,721 6.6% 93.4% 250
Say-on-Pay Board (14 inferred) 191,261 180,124 90.9% 9.1% 46
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (110 inferred) 118 118 98.3% 1.7% 0
Capital Structure Board 139,693 138,829 93.2% 6.8% 386
Capital Structure Shareholders (58 inferred) 836 836 44.5% 55.5% 0
Audit-related Board 118,125 117,165 98.4% 1.6% 831
Audit-related Shareholders (81 inferred) 94 94 88.3% 11.7% 0
Compensation Board 114,253 113,541 91.5% 8.5% 421
Compensation Shareholders (19 inferred) 929 871 20.1% 79.9% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 40,908 40,529 84.5% 15.5% 215
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (4 inferred) 86 86 4.7% 95.3% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 10,678 10,314 95.3% 4.7% 362
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (123 inferred) 6,691 6,690 17.2% 82.8% 0
Other Social Issues Board 6,407 6,349 95.0% 5.0% 54
Other Social Issues Shareholders 3,357 3,232 5.5% 94.5% 64
Environment or Climate Board 820 820 64.8% 35.2% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders (4 inferred) 4,233 4,205 6.1% 93.9% 8
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 87 87 1.1% 98.9% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 3,844 3,844 4.4% 95.6% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 1,698 1,637 0.3% 99.7% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 52 52 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (2,002 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where BlackRock broke with the board (6,035 distinct proposals) →

What BlackRock said it would do

The page above is what BlackRock did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under BlackRock, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
BlackRock filed 1,757,643 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 1,606,521 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 11,688 issuer names and 392 funds. They cover 148,589 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
16,437 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted298 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type7,827 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote8,312 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

BlackRock proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).