proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › BlackRock › 2024-2025

BlackRock proxy voting record, 2024-2025

BlackRock reported 1,506,193 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 1,174,879 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.9% of the time. On the 12,774 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 2.3% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.9% FOR of 1,174,879 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 1,102,932 AGAINST 54,715 Abstained or withheld 17,232

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

2.3% FOR of 12,774 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 12,686.

FOR 294 AGAINST 12,480 Abstained 129

See the 294 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

BlackRock, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (317 inferred) 714,093 696,887 96.8% 3.2% 15,029
Director Elections Shareholders (1,903 inferred) 1,903 1,895 2.7% 97.3% 3
Corporate Governance Board (215 inferred) 158,970 150,334 93.5% 6.5% 8,269
Corporate Governance Shareholders (1,048 inferred) 9,755 9,532 8.5% 91.5% 136
Say-on-Pay Board (1 inferred) 154,018 143,999 91.7% 8.3% 104
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (168 inferred) 230 229 81.2% 18.8% 0
Capital Structure Board (69 inferred) 109,746 108,404 92.7% 7.3% 849
Capital Structure Shareholders (722 inferred) 1,728 1,723 27.3% 72.7% 1
Audit-related Board (22 inferred) 104,416 103,687 99.0% 1.0% 699
Audit-related Shareholders (85 inferred) 214 211 50.2% 49.8% 0
Compensation Board (55 inferred) 99,516 98,320 92.2% 7.8% 1,089
Compensation Shareholders (315 inferred) 2,507 2,404 11.0% 89.0% 36
Extraordinary Transactions Board 34,854 34,406 85.7% 14.3% 215
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (21 inferred) 40 40 57.5% 42.5% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 11,291 10,912 96.2% 3.8% 368
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (223 inferred) 2,863 2,863 29.5% 70.5% 0
Other Social Issues Board 4,758 4,662 93.2% 6.8% 96
Other Social Issues Shareholders (23 inferred) 6,784 6,739 2.8% 97.2% 44
Environment or Climate Board 837 835 100.0% 0.0% 2
Environment or Climate Shareholders (7 inferred) 6,375 6,367 1.4% 98.6% 7
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 357 357 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders (3 inferred) 5,964 5,928 1.1% 98.9% 36
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 283 283 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 4,216 4,164 0.0% 100.0% 51
Investment Company Matters Board 161 161 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (5,197 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where BlackRock broke with the board (6,039 distinct proposals) →

What BlackRock said it would do

The page above is what BlackRock did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under BlackRock, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
BlackRock filed 1,506,193 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 1,381,548 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 14,673 issuer names and 409 funds. They cover 145,093 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
13,403 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type7,776 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate14 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote5,613 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

BlackRock proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.