proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › AQR › 2025-2026

AQR proxy voting record, 2025-2026

AQR reported 163,755 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 128,774 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.7% of the time. On the 1,101 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 12.7% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.7% FOR of 128,774 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 120,609 AGAINST 6,496 Abstained or withheld 1,669

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

12.7% FOR of 1,101 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,099.

FOR 140 AGAINST 961 Abstained 0

See the 140 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

AQR, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (457 inferred) 82,644 80,667 96.0% 4.0% 1,668
Director Elections Shareholders (2 inferred) 4 2 50.0% 50.0% 2
Corporate Governance Board 21,174 21,161 96.1% 3.9% 3
Corporate Governance Shareholders (34 inferred) 2,427 2,415 43.7% 56.3% 12
Compensation Board (132 inferred) 14,916 14,893 86.4% 13.6% 0
Compensation Shareholders (2 inferred) 208 198 30.8% 69.2% 0
Capital Structure Board 11,996 11,996 96.7% 3.3% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders (10 inferred) 164 164 63.4% 36.6% 0
Audit-related Board 10,823 10,823 99.1% 0.9% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (14 inferred) 133 132 65.9% 34.1% 1
Say-on-Pay Board (3,092 inferred) 9,316 8,669 89.3% 10.7% 1
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (15 inferred) 15 15 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 827 827 99.9% 0.1% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,055 1,048 8.8% 91.2% 0
Environment or Climate Board 484 484 99.4% 0.6% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,039 1,039 4.6% 95.4% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 740 739 89.2% 10.8% 1
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 6 6 0.0% 100.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 414 414 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 299 299 0.0% 100.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 414 414 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 282 282 18.1% 81.9% 0
Other Board 178 178 92.7% 7.3% 0
Other Shareholders 258 258 18.6% 81.4% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 249 249 94.0% 6.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 126 126 64.3% 35.7% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 3 3 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (3,758 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where AQR broke with the board (2,291 distinct proposals) →

What AQR said it would do

The page above is what AQR did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under AQR Capital, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
AQR filed 163,755 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 154,191 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 3,934 issuer names and 25 funds. They cover 32,955 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
1,005 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type641 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote364 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

AQR proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).