proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › AQR › 2024-2025

AQR proxy voting record, 2024-2025

AQR reported 123,579 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 96,508 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 92.5% of the time. On the 1,161 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 67.8% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

92.5% FOR of 96,508 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 89,315 AGAINST 5,529 Abstained or withheld 1,664

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

67.8% FOR of 1,161 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,152.

FOR 787 AGAINST 374 Abstained 0

See the 787 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

AQR, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (344 inferred) 61,583 59,653 95.1% 4.9% 1,664
Director Elections Shareholders (11 inferred) 15 13 15.4% 84.6% 2
Corporate Governance Board 16,106 16,097 95.0% 5.0% 7
Corporate Governance Shareholders (6 inferred) 1,505 1,505 44.4% 55.6% 0
Compensation Board (116 inferred) 10,766 10,762 86.4% 13.6% 4
Compensation Shareholders (18 inferred) 320 320 40.6% 59.4% 0
Capital Structure Board 9,279 9,279 94.7% 5.3% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders (1 inferred) 120 120 39.2% 60.8% 0
Audit-related Board 7,964 7,963 99.7% 0.3% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (7 inferred) 100 100 66.0% 34.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board (2,925 inferred) 7,665 7,044 89.3% 10.7% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (8 inferred) 8 8 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 599 599 99.2% 0.8% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 881 881 40.9% 59.1% 0
Environment or Climate Board 353 353 92.9% 7.1% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,063 1,061 49.8% 50.2% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 283 283 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 419 419 28.6% 71.4% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 558 557 87.4% 12.6% 1
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 283 283 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 189 189 89.4% 10.6% 0
Other Board 145 142 93.0% 7.0% 3
Other Shareholders 209 209 11.5% 88.5% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 237 233 91.8% 8.2% 4
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (8 inferred) 79 79 98.7% 1.3% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 130 130 96.9% 3.1% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (3,444 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where AQR broke with the board (2,595 distinct proposals) →

What AQR said it would do

The page above is what AQR did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under AQR Capital, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
AQR filed 123,579 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 116,311 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 3,891 issuer names and 21 funds. They cover 33,170 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
892 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type621 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote271 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

AQR proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.