TRUECAR, INC. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among TrueCar, Inc. (the "Company"), Fair Holdings, Inc. ("Parent") and Rapid Merger Subsidiary, Inc. ("Merger Subsidiary") pursuant to which, among other things, Merger Subsidiary will merge with and into the Company, with the Company surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (such merger, the "Merger" and such proposal, the "Merger Proposal").

TRUECAR, INC.’s own tally for this item (“1. Merger Proposal: To approve and adopt the Merger Agreement pursuant to which, among other things, Merger Subsidiary will merge with and into the Company, with the Company surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pare”): 69,723,284 for, 84,731 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed December 23, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Each of the proposals was approved by the requisite vote of the Company's stockholders.”
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a supermajority of the shares outstanding (“78.83% of the outstanding”).

The 44 asset managers below reported 12,265,382 for, 61,980 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 44 asset managers. See all 44 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if a quorum is not present or there are not sufficient votes cast at the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Proposal (the "Adjournment Proposal").

TRUECAR, INC.’s own tally for this item (“3. Adjournment Proposal: To approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if a quorum is not present or there are not sufficient votes cast at the Special Meeting to”): 67,873,932 for, 1,934,500 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed December 23, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 3: Adjournment Proposal: To approve one or more adjournments of the Special Meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if a quorum is not present or there are not sufficient votes cast at the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Proposal (the "Adjournment Prop”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 44 asset managers below reported 12,160,017 for, 105,365 against, 61,980 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 44 asset managers. See all 44 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the Company's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the Merger (the "Advisory Compensation Proposal").

TRUECAR, INC.’s own tally for this item (“2. Advisory Compensation Proposal: To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the Company's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the ”): 67,101,348 for, 2,783,000 against, per its Form 8-K filed December 23, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 44 managers: 11,989,490 for, 337,872 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 94 managers: 41,120,510 for, 961,668 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

The 2 asset managers below reported 32,116 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.