Home › Companies › Tesla, Inc. › 2025-2026

Tesla, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Compiled from SEC Form N-PX filings and Tesla, Inc.’s Form 8-K, filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07 on EDGAR). Page generated October 18, 2026.

16Ballot items
1,559Asset managers
24,556Fund votes
November 6, 2025Meeting date

Results at a glance

Meeting of November 6, 2025: 16 items on Tesla, Inc.’s Form 8-K, filed November 7, 2025: 3 elected · 5 approved · 8 not approved.

Not approved or not elected

6. Management proposal for adoption of amendments to our certificate of formation and bylaws to eliminate applicable supermajority voting… 58% of votes cast Not approved Under 80% Not approved: the filing states that this item needed more than a majority of the votes cast.

Material dissent

Elect Director: Ira Ehrenpreis 65% of votes cast Elected Director under 80%
Elect Director: Kathleen Wilson-Thompson 78% of votes cast Elected Director under 80%
3. Management proposal to approve the A&R 2019 Equity Incentive Plan 79% of votes cast Approved Under 80%
4. Management proposal to approve the 2025 CEO Performance Award 77% of votes cast Approved Under 80%
7. Shareholder proposal regarding Board authorization of an investment in x.AI Corp 53.6% of votes cast Not approved Shareholder proposal won a majority A stricter vote than a majority of the votes cast may have applied to this item; the filing does not state it.
12. Shareholder proposal to elect each director annually 54.3% of votes cast Approved Shareholder proposal won a majority

Material dissent: a director nominee under 80% of the votes cast, say-on-pay under 70%, any other item the board put forward under 80%, or a shareholder proposal with more than 50%, on the company’s own Form 8-K tally. How this is decided

Proxy season: 2023-2024 2025-2026

Explore Tesla, Inc. in the interactive database Compare manager voting policies

Official 2025-2026 meeting results reported by Tesla, Inc.

These tallies are Tesla, Inc.’s own, as disclosed to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K, filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07, “Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders”). They cover every share voted at the meeting, not just the funds that file Form N-PX.

Tesla, Inc. — official shareholder meeting results, meeting held November 6, 2025
Ballot item	For	Against	Abstain	Withheld	Broker non-votes	Support (of votes cast)	Reported outcome	Voting standard
Elect Director: Ira Ehrenpreis	1,594,744,259	858,829,029	15,831,288	--	302,456,274	65%	Elected	—
Elect Director: Joe Gebbia	2,141,079,061	310,503,173	17,822,342	--	302,456,274	87%	Elected	—
Elect Director: Kathleen Wilson-Thompson	1,924,321,801	529,031,020	16,051,755	--	302,456,274	78%	Elected	—
2. Management proposal to approve executive compensation on a non-binding advisory basis	1,931,965,361	523,895,380	13,543,835	--	302,456,274	79%	Approved	—
3. Management proposal to approve the A&R 2019 Equity Incentive Plan	1,942,926,670	514,568,170	11,909,736	--	302,456,274	79%	Approved	—
4. Management proposal to approve the 2025 CEO Performance Award	1,892,235,822	564,940,908	12,227,846	--	302,456,274	77%	Approved	—
5. Management proposal for the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Tesla's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025	2,689,221,182	66,780,222	15,859,446	--	--	98%	Approved	—
6. Management proposal for adoption of amendments to our certificate of formation and bylaws to eliminate applicable supermajority voting requirements	1,309,549,644	955,682,310	181,764,443	--	302,456,274	58%	Not approved Not approved: the filing states that this item needed more than a majority of the votes cast.	—
7. Shareholder proposal regarding Board authorization of an investment in x.AI Corp	1,058,999,435	916,321,296	473,073,200	--	302,456,274	53.6%	Not approved A stricter vote than a majority of the votes cast may have applied to this item; the filing does not state it.	—
8. Shareholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of integrating sustainability metrics into senior executive compensation plans	216,413,542	2,223,974,663	29,016,371	--	302,456,274	9%	Not approved	—
9. Shareholder proposal requesting a child labor audit	188,709,041	2,238,338,124	42,357,411	--	302,456,274	8%	Not approved	—
10. Shareholder proposal to amend the bylaws to repeal the 3% derivative suit ownership threshold	611,152,245	1,821,038,859	37,213,472	--	302,456,274	25%	Not approved	—
11. Shareholder proposal to amend Article X of the bylaws	378,933,020	2,049,407,756	41,063,800	--	302,456,274	16%	Not approved	—
12. Shareholder proposal to elect each director annually	1,328,135,664	1,118,920,427	22,348,485	--	302,456,274	54.3%	Approved	—
13. Shareholder proposal regarding a proposal, which won 54% support at our 2024 annual meeting	787,399,596	1,648,698,264	33,306,716	--	302,456,274	32%	Not approved	—
14. Shareholder proposal to seek shareholder approval before adopting an amendment to the bylaws pursuant to Section 21.373 of the TBOC	1,205,163,451	1,234,433,868	29,807,257	--	302,456,274	49.4%	Not approved	—

Source: Tesla, Inc., Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 7, 2025 — read the filing on EDGAR.

How asset managers voted at the Tesla, Inc. 2025-2026 meeting

Each item below shows how the 1,559 asset managers that disclosed a Tesla, Inc. vote in their SEC Form N-PX filings actually voted. Share totals are the shares those managers' funds voted, summed across every fund they report.

1. Elect Director: Ira Ehrenpreis

Official resultDIRECTOR ELECTIONSReported outcome: Elected

Combines 9 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

65% Majority: yes · of votes cast

FOR 65%AGAINST

FOR: 1,594,744,259AGAINST: 858,829,029

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 250 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A Tesla proposal to elect three Class III directors to serve for a term of three years, or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified: Ira Ehrenpreis

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Ira Ehrenpreis”): 1,594,744,259 for, 858,829,029 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 The individuals listed below were elected as Class III directors at the Annual Meeting to serve on the Board for a term of three years or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.”
Support: 65% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 250 asset managers below reported 363,592,837 for, 228,166,253 against, 429,987 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 1,148 unknown.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 363,592,837AGAINST: 228,166,253ABSTAIN: 429,987NOT VOTED: 2,191UNKNOWN: 1,148

Largest asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal to elect three Class III directors to serve for a term of three years, or until their respect” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	233,405,298	4,110,550	14	For
Fidelity	673,196	77,982,988	0	Against
Capital Group	47,809,999	496,210	0	For
BlackRock	359,697	35,314,579	0	Against
State Street	51,787	21,769,369	0	Against
Charles Schwab	6,973,322	11,666,588	188,087	Mixed
JPMorgan	18,703,679	0	0	For
TIAA	0	12,553,261	0	Against
T. Rowe Price	0	12,463,786	0	Against
Invesco	11,120,481	0	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	7,925,136	0	0	For
American Century	5,215,042	328,872	0	Mixed
ARK ETF Trust	4,567,187	0	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	0	4,303,413	0	Against
Jackson National	318,641	3,712,001	0	Mixed
Prudential/PGIM	3,339,768	163,100	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,380,387	0	0	For
Equitable	836,832	2,172,842	0	Mixed
Columbia Threadneedle	541,492	2,276,785	0	Mixed
ProShares	0	2,319,052	0	Against
Dimensional	0	2,219,189	0	Against
John Hancock	169,918	1,862,695	0	Mixed
Victory Capital	239,690	1,770,878	0	Mixed
Brighthouse	831,349	903,174	159,074	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	0	1,811,136	0	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 250 asset managers. See all 250 in the interactive database.

2. Elect Director: Joe Gebbia

Official resultDIRECTOR ELECTIONSReported outcome: Elected

Combines 10 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

87% Majority: yes · of votes cast

FOR 87%

FOR: 2,141,079,061AGAINST: 310,503,173

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 250 asset managers

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Joe Gebbia”): 2,141,079,061 for, 310,503,173 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 The individuals listed below were elected as Class III directors at the Annual Meeting to serve on the Board for a term of three years or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.”
Support: 87% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 250 asset managers below reported 513,804,172 for, 77,954,894 against, 430,010 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 1,148 unknown.

FOR

FOR: 513,804,172AGAINST: 77,954,894ABSTAIN: 430,010NOT VOTED: 2,191UNKNOWN: 1,148

Largest asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal to elect three Class III directors to serve for a term of three years, or until their respect” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	233,686,910	3,828,937	14	For
Fidelity	58,246,011	20,410,173	0	Mixed
Capital Group	48,306,209	0	0	For
BlackRock	3,076,470	32,597,806	0	Mixed
State Street	21,813,981	7,175	0	For
Charles Schwab	15,818,593	2,821,317	188,087	Mixed
JPMorgan	18,703,679	0	0	For
TIAA	12,553,261	0	0	For
T. Rowe Price	12,423,611	40,175	0	For
Invesco	11,120,481	0	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	7,925,136	0	0	For
American Century	5,543,914	0	0	For
ARK ETF Trust	4,567,187	0	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	55,761	4,247,652	0	Against
Jackson National	3,837,837	192,805	0	For
Prudential/PGIM	3,502,868	0	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,380,387	0	0	For
Equitable	853,509	2,156,165	0	Mixed
Columbia Threadneedle	2,818,277	0	0	For
ProShares	2,319,052	0	0	For
Dimensional	0	2,219,189	0	Against
John Hancock	1,830,312	202,301	0	Mixed
Victory Capital	2,010,568	0	0	For
Brighthouse	1,587,525	146,998	159,074	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	0	1,811,136	0	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 250 asset managers. See all 250 in the interactive database.

3. Elect Director: Kathleen Wilson-Thompson

Official resultDIRECTOR ELECTIONSReported outcome: Elected

Combines 10 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

78% Majority: yes · of votes cast

FOR 78%AGAINST

FOR: 1,924,321,801AGAINST: 529,031,020

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 250 asset managers

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Kathleen Wilson-Thompson”): 1,924,321,801 for, 529,031,020 against, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 The individuals listed below were elected as Class III directors at the Annual Meeting to serve on the Board for a term of three years or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.”
Support: 78% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 250 asset managers below reported 470,109,072 for, 121,650,002 against, 430,002 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 1,148 unknown.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 470,109,072AGAINST: 121,650,002ABSTAIN: 430,002NOT VOTED: 2,191UNKNOWN: 1,148

Largest asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal to elect three Class III directors to serve for a term of three years, or until their respect” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	237,425,139	90,709	14	For
Fidelity	58,339,888	20,316,296	0	Mixed
Capital Group	48,306,209	0	0	For
BlackRock	0	35,674,276	0	Against
State Street	56,638	21,764,518	0	Against
Charles Schwab	13,180,222	5,459,688	188,087	Mixed
JPMorgan	18,703,679	0	0	For
TIAA	0	12,553,261	0	Against
T. Rowe Price	12,423,611	40,175	0	For
Invesco	11,120,481	0	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	7,925,136	0	0	For
American Century	5,303,949	239,965	0	For
ARK ETF Trust	4,567,187	0	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	0	4,303,413	0	Against
Jackson National	1,090,789	2,939,853	0	Mixed
Prudential/PGIM	3,502,868	0	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,380,387	0	0	For
Equitable	853,509	2,156,165	0	Mixed
Columbia Threadneedle	2,818,277	0	0	For
ProShares	2,319,052	0	0	For
Dimensional	0	2,219,189	0	Against
John Hancock	2,011,415	21,198	0	For
Victory Capital	2,010,568	0	0	For
Brighthouse	1,581,022	153,501	159,074	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	0	1,811,136	0	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 250 asset managers. See all 250 in the interactive database.

4. 6. Management proposal for adoption of amendments to our certificate of formation and bylaws to eliminate applicable…

Official resultCORPORATE GOVERNANCEReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 9 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

58% Not approved · of votes cast

FOR 58%AGAINST

FOR: 1,309,549,644AGAINST: 955,682,310

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 255 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A Tesla proposal for adoption of amendments to certificate of formation and bylaws to eliminate applicable supermajority voting requirements.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“6. Management proposal for adoption of amendments to our certificate of formation and bylaws to eliminate applicable supermajority voting requirements”): 1,309,549,644 for, 955,682,310 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07). This item required more than a simple majority of votes cast — see the filing.

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Not approved: the filing states that this item needed more than a majority of the votes cast.
Support: 58% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 255 asset managers below reported 507,848,846 for, 84,026,392 against, 212,790 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 497 mixed.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 507,848,846AGAINST: 84,026,392ABSTAIN: 212,790NOT VOTED: 2,191MIXED: 497

Largest asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal for adoption of amendments to certificate of formation and bylaws to eliminate applicable sup” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	237,451,711	633	63,516	For
Fidelity	77,857,630	798,554	0	For
Capital Group	6,652,699	41,653,510	0	Mixed
BlackRock	3,076,470	32,597,806	0	Mixed
State Street	21,815,913	0	5,243	For
Charles Schwab	18,827,997	0	0	For
JPMorgan	18,703,679	0	0	For
TIAA	12,553,261	0	0	For
T. Rowe Price	12,463,786	0	0	For
Invesco	11,120,481	0	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	7,925,136	0	0	For
American Century	5,543,914	0	0	For
ARK ETF Trust	4,567,187	0	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	55,761	4,247,652	0	Against
Jackson National	4,030,642	0	0	For
Prudential/PGIM	3,502,868	0	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,380,387	0	0	For
Equitable	2,257,820	751,854	0	Mixed
Columbia Threadneedle	2,818,277	0	0	For
ProShares	2,319,052	0	0	For
Dimensional	2,219,189	0	0	For
John Hancock	2,032,613	0	0	For
Victory Capital	2,010,568	0	0	For
Brighthouse	1,893,597	0	0	For
Six Circles Trust	0	1,811,136	0	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 255 asset managers. See all 255 in the interactive database.

5. 4. Management proposal to approve the 2025 CEO Performance Award

Official resultCOMPENSATIONReported outcome: Approved

Combines 12 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

77% Approved · of votes cast

FOR 77%AGAINST

FOR: 1,892,235,822AGAINST: 564,940,908

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 273 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A Tesla proposal for approval of the 2025 CEO Performance Award.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“4. Management proposal to approve the 2025 CEO Performance Award”): 1,892,235,822 for, 564,940,908 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was approved.”
Support: 77% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Tesla, Inc.’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Approve Issuance of Common Stock to Elon Musk Pursuant to CEO Performance Award” (15 managers, 19,736,674 for, 599,166 against).

The 273 asset managers below reported 486,726,631 for, 86,350,287 against, 1,372,163 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 1,148 unknown.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 486,726,631AGAINST: 86,350,287ABSTAIN: 1,372,163NOT VOTED: 2,191UNKNOWN: 1,148

Largest asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal for approval of the 2025 CEO Performance Award.” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	233,405,369	4,110,483	9	For
Fidelity	76,124,957	1,227,196	1,304,031	For
Capital Group	42,149,720	6,156,489	0	Mixed
BlackRock	35,674,276	0	0	For
State Street	49,293	21,771,863	0	Against
Charles Schwab	18,822,853	5,144	0	For
TIAA	1,414,621	11,138,640	0	Mixed
T. Rowe Price	6,779,401	5,684,385	0	Mixed
Invesco	10,887,983	232,498	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	7,925,136	0	0	For
American Century	5,303,949	239,965	0	For
ARK ETF Trust	4,567,187	0	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,303,413	0	0	For
Jackson National	3,747,914	282,728	0	Mixed
Prudential/PGIM	2,186,449	1,316,419	0	Mixed
Loomis Sayles	3,380,387	0	0	For
Columbia Threadneedle	0	2,818,277	0	Against
Equitable	2,688,096	54,132	0	For
ProShares	0	2,319,052	0	Against
Dimensional	0	2,219,189	0	Against
John Hancock	202,618	1,829,995	0	Mixed
Victory Capital	239,690	1,770,878	0	Mixed
Brighthouse	1,099,476	780,806	0	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	1,811,136	0	0	For
Putnam	1,771,766	0	0	For

Showing the 25 largest of 273 asset managers. See all 273 in the interactive database.

6. 3. Management proposal to approve the A&R 2019 Equity Incentive Plan

Official resultCAPITAL STRUCTUREReported outcome: Approved

Combines 13 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

79% Approved · of votes cast

FOR 79%AGAINST

FOR: 1,942,926,670AGAINST: 514,568,170

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 269 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A Tesla proposal for approval of the A&R 2019 Equity Incentive Plan.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“3. Management proposal to approve the A&R 2019 Equity Incentive Plan”): 1,942,926,670 for, 514,568,170 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was approved.”
Support: 79% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 269 asset managers below reported 467,286,766 for, 105,152,156 against, 350,482 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 1,148 unknown.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 467,286,766AGAINST: 105,152,156ABSTAIN: 350,482NOT VOTED: 2,191UNKNOWN: 1,148

Largest asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal for approval of the A&R 2019 Equity Incentive Plan.” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	234,953,214	2,562,633	14	For
Fidelity	22,052,657	56,603,527	0	Mixed
Capital Group	41,653,510	6,652,699	0	Mixed
BlackRock	35,674,276	0	0	For
State Street	21,807,185	13,971	0	For
Charles Schwab	10,170,816	8,469,094	188,087	Mixed
TIAA	12,553,261	0	0	For
T. Rowe Price	12,423,611	40,175	0	For
Invesco	10,887,983	232,498	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	7,925,136	0	0	For
American Century	5,303,949	239,965	0	For
ARK ETF Trust	4,567,187	0	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,303,413	0	0	For
Jackson National	3,837,837	192,805	0	For
Prudential/PGIM	3,329,279	173,589	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,380,387	0	0	For
Columbia Threadneedle	2,818,277	0	0	For
Equitable	1,381,400	1,360,828	0	Mixed
ProShares	0	2,319,052	0	Against
Dimensional	0	2,219,189	0	Against
John Hancock	766,765	1,265,848	0	Mixed
Victory Capital	239,690	1,770,878	0	Mixed
Brighthouse	1,175,878	545,330	159,074	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	1,811,136	0	0	For
Putnam	0	1,771,766	0	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 269 asset managers. See all 269 in the interactive database.

7. 2. Management proposal to approve executive compensation on a non-binding advisory basis

Official result Fund totals may overlapSECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESReported outcome: Approved

Combines 41 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

79% Approved · of votes cast

FOR 79%AGAINST

FOR: 1,931,965,361AGAINST: 523,895,380

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 1,477 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A Tesla proposal for a non-binding advisory vote approving 2024 executive compensation.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“2. Management proposal to approve executive compensation on a non-binding advisory basis”): 1,931,965,361 for, 523,895,380 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Tesla, Inc.’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Advisory Vote to Ratify Named Executive Officers' Compensation” (67 managers, Fund and manager reports combined; may count the same shares twice; no share total shown); “SAY ON PAY” (7 managers, 49,415 for, 651,163 against, 5,355 not voted); “Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation” (6 managers, 55,249 for, 3,213 against, 320 abstained); “To Approve, By An Advisory Vote, The Compensation Of The Company's Named Executives” (2 managers, 906 against).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports: 236 asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal for a non-binding advisory vote approving 2024 executive compensation.” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	237,170,670	345,180	13	For
Fidelity	58,669,697	19,986,487	0	Mixed
Capital Group	0	48,306,209	0	Against
BlackRock	35,674,276	0	0	For
State Street	21,809,679	11,477	0	For
Charles Schwab	10,546,989	8,092,921	188,087	Mixed
TIAA	0	12,553,261	0	Against
T. Rowe Price	12,423,611	40,175	0	For
Invesco	10,887,983	232,498	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	7,925,136	0	0	For
American Century	5,215,042	328,872	0	Mixed
ARK ETF Trust	4,567,187	0	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,303,413	0	0	For
Jackson National	3,916,044	114,598	0	For
Prudential/PGIM	3,429,219	73,649	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,380,387	0	0	For
Columbia Threadneedle	2,818,277	0	0	For
Equitable	1,293,540	1,448,688	0	Mixed
ProShares	0	2,319,052	0	Against
Dimensional	0	2,219,189	0	Against
John Hancock	936,683	1,095,930	0	Mixed
Victory Capital	239,690	1,770,878	0	Mixed
Brighthouse	1,175,878	545,330	159,074	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	1,811,136	0	0	For
Putnam	1,771,766	0	0	For

Fund voting reports, all 236 managers: 450,181,102 for, 120,930,330 against, 429,966 abstained, 2,192 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports: 1,275 asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal for a non-binding advisory vote approving 2024 executive compensation.” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
BlackRock	105,393,559	4,758,284	0	For
State Street	64,595,470	1,986,337	0	For
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC	65,231,991	0	0	For
Capital Group	3,560	46,565,679	0	Against
T. Rowe Price	30,259,771	67,739	0	For
Vanguard	27,725,752	282,858	0	For
Fidelity	1,638	26,596,635	0	Against
Northern Trust	0	22,936,966	0	Against
Amundi	0	21,330,866	0	Against
Charles Schwab	10,920,806	8,379,957	194,762	Mixed
Invesco	18,966,868	462,709	0	For
MELLON INVESTMENTS Corp	14,597,746	0	0	For
Nuveen	0	13,042,219	0	Against
UBS	0	12,357,152	0	Against
Goldman Sachs	11,387,099	2,949	0	For
Legal & General Investment Management Ltd	18,324	11,155,215	0	Against
Loomis Sayles	10,523,960	312,802	0	For
PARAMETRIC PORTFOLIO ASSOCIATES LLC	10,637,285	0	0	For
National Pension Service	9,869,161	0	0	For
BAMCO INC /NY/	9,280,153	0	0	For
Capital Research Global Investors	0	8,995,262	0	Against
JENNISON ASSOCIATES LLC	7,874,989	12,326	0	For
Wellington	6,982,534	0	0	For
American Century	6,418,925	338,455	0	Mixed
PRIMECAP MANAGEMENT CO/CA/	6,643,300	0	0	For

Institutional-manager reports, all 1,275 managers: 477,278,776 for, 352,230,840 against, 390,580 abstained, 281,872 not voted, 37,617 mixed, 10,650 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

8. 5. Management proposal for the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Tesla's independent…

Official resultAUDIT-RELATEDReported outcome: Approved

Combines 8 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

98% Approved · of votes cast

FOR 98%

FOR: 2,689,221,182AGAINST: 66,780,222

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 255 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A Tesla proposal for the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Tesla's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“5. Management proposal for the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Tesla's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025”): 2,689,221,182 for, 66,780,222 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was approved.”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 255 asset managers below reported 591,393,433 for, 565,470 against, 240,546 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 1,148 unknown.

FOR

FOR: 591,393,433AGAINST: 565,470ABSTAIN: 240,546NOT VOTED: 2,191UNKNOWN: 1,148

Largest asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal for the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Tesla's independent ” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	237,452,219	63,630	12	For
Fidelity	78,656,184	0	0	For
Capital Group	48,306,209	0	0	For
BlackRock	35,674,276	0	0	For
State Street	21,820,607	549	0	For
Charles Schwab	18,827,997	0	0	For
JPMorgan	18,703,679	0	0	For
TIAA	12,553,261	0	0	For
T. Rowe Price	12,463,786	0	0	For
Invesco	11,120,481	0	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	7,925,136	0	0	For
American Century	5,543,914	0	0	For
ARK ETF Trust	4,567,187	0	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,303,413	0	0	For
Jackson National	4,030,642	0	0	For
Prudential/PGIM	3,502,868	0	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,380,387	0	0	For
Equitable	3,009,674	0	0	For
Columbia Threadneedle	2,818,277	0	0	For
ProShares	2,319,052	0	0	For
Dimensional	2,219,189	0	0	For
John Hancock	2,032,613	0	0	For
Victory Capital	2,010,568	0	0	For
Brighthouse	1,734,523	0	159,074	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	1,811,136	0	0	For

Showing the 25 largest of 255 asset managers. See all 255 in the interactive database.

9. 8. Shareholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of integrating…

Official resultCOMPENSATIONReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 13 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

9% Not approved · of votes cast

9%AGAINST

FOR: 216,413,542AGAINST: 2,223,974,663

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 273 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A shareholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of integrating sustainability metrics into senior executive compensation plans.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“8. Shareholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of integrating sustainability metrics into senior executive compensation plans”): 216,413,542 for, 2,223,974,663 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Support: 9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 273 asset managers below reported 5,129,076 for, 586,990,747 against, 1,509,032 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 4,944 unknown.

AGAINST

FOR: 5,129,076AGAINST: 586,990,747ABSTAIN: 1,509,032UNKNOWN: 4,944NOT VOTED: 2,191

Largest asset managers voting on “A shareholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of integr” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	63,780	237,452,056	25	Against
Fidelity	0	78,656,184	0	Against
Capital Group	0	48,306,209	0	Against
BlackRock	0	35,674,276	0	Against
State Street	7,175	21,813,981	0	Against
Charles Schwab	0	18,827,997	0	Against
JPMorgan	10,644	18,693,035	0	Against
TIAA	0	12,553,261	0	Against
T. Rowe Price	0	12,463,786	0	Against
Invesco	0	11,120,481	0	Against
BARON SELECT FUNDS	0	7,925,136	0	Against
American Century	189,635	5,354,279	0	Against
ARK ETF Trust	0	4,567,187	0	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	0	4,303,413	0	Against
Jackson National	0	4,030,642	0	Against
Prudential/PGIM	22,646	3,502,868	0	Against
Loomis Sayles	0	3,380,387	0	Against
Equitable	9,755	2,999,919	0	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	0	2,818,277	0	Against
ProShares	0	2,319,052	0	Against
Dimensional	0	2,219,189	0	Against
John Hancock	0	2,032,613	0	Against
Victory Capital	0	2,010,568	0	Against
Brighthouse	0	1,690,878	202,719	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	0	1,811,136	0	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 273 asset managers. See all 273 in the interactive database.

10. 10. Shareholder proposal to amend the bylaws to repeal the 3% derivative suit ownership threshold

Official resultCORPORATE GOVERNANCEReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 6 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

25% Not approved · of votes cast

FOR 25%AGAINST

FOR: 611,152,245AGAINST: 1,821,038,859

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 252 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A shareholder proposal to amend the bylaws to repeal 3% derivative suit ownership threshold.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“10. Shareholder proposal to amend the bylaws to repeal the 3% derivative suit ownership threshold”): 611,152,245 for, 1,821,038,859 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Support: 25% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 252 asset managers below reported 222,159,063 for, 364,311,216 against, 5,654,721 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 4,944 unknown.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 222,159,063AGAINST: 364,311,216ABSTAIN: 5,654,721UNKNOWN: 4,944NOT VOTED: 2,191

Largest asset managers voting on “A shareholder proposal to amend the bylaws to repeal 3% derivative suit ownership threshold.” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	90,745	233,659,846	3,765,270	Against
Fidelity	76,868,338	1,693,969	93,877	For
Capital Group	48,306,209	0	0	For
BlackRock	32,597,806	3,076,470	0	Mixed
State Street	0	21,821,156	0	Against
Charles Schwab	18,813,929	14,068	0	For
JPMorgan	18,703,679	0	0	For
TIAA	0	12,553,261	0	Against
T. Rowe Price	0	12,463,786	0	Against
Invesco	0	11,120,481	0	Against
BARON SELECT FUNDS	0	7,925,136	0	Against
American Century	239,965	5,303,949	0	Against
ARK ETF Trust	0	4,567,187	0	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,247,652	55,761	0	For
Jackson National	58,214	3,804,298	168,130	Mixed
Prudential/PGIM	1,551,327	1,951,541	0	Mixed
Loomis Sayles	0	3,380,387	0	Against
Equitable	2,691,057	318,617	0	Mixed
Columbia Threadneedle	0	2,818,277	0	Against
ProShares	0	2,319,052	0	Against
Dimensional	0	2,219,189	0	Against
John Hancock	0	1,851,510	181,103	Mixed
Victory Capital	0	2,010,568	0	Against
Brighthouse	58,825	1,563,998	270,774	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	1,811,136	0	0	For

Showing the 25 largest of 252 asset managers. See all 252 in the interactive database.

11. 11. Shareholder proposal to amend Article X of the bylaws

Official resultCORPORATE GOVERNANCEReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 4 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

16% Not approved · of votes cast

FOR 16%AGAINST

FOR: 378,933,020AGAINST: 2,049,407,756

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 248 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A shareholder proposal to amend Article X of the bylaws.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“11. Shareholder proposal to amend Article X of the bylaws”): 378,933,020 for, 2,049,407,756 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Support: 16% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 248 asset managers below reported 71,835,486 for, 493,456,986 against, 5,655,021 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 4,944 unknown.

AGAINST

FOR: 71,835,486AGAINST: 493,456,986ABSTAIN: 5,655,021UNKNOWN: 4,944NOT VOTED: 2,191

Largest asset managers voting on “A shareholder proposal to amend Article X of the bylaws.” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	90,649	233,659,939	3,765,273	Against
Fidelity	20,316,296	58,246,011	93,877	Mixed
Capital Group	0	48,306,209	0	Against
BlackRock	32,597,806	3,076,470	0	Mixed
State Street	0	21,821,156	0	Against
Charles Schwab	5,144	18,822,853	0	Against
TIAA	0	12,553,261	0	Against
T. Rowe Price	0	12,463,786	0	Against
Invesco	0	11,120,481	0	Against
BARON SELECT FUNDS	0	7,925,136	0	Against
American Century	0	5,543,914	0	Against
ARK ETF Trust	0	4,567,187	0	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,247,652	55,761	0	For
Jackson National	0	3,862,512	168,130	Against
Prudential/PGIM	1,242,770	2,260,098	0	Mixed
Loomis Sayles	0	3,380,387	0	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	0	2,818,277	0	Against
Equitable	821,769	1,920,459	0	Mixed
ProShares	0	2,319,052	0	Against
Dimensional	0	2,219,189	0	Against
John Hancock	0	1,851,510	181,103	Mixed
Victory Capital	0	2,010,568	0	Against
Brighthouse	10,212	1,599,296	270,774	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	1,811,136	0	0	For
Putnam	0	1,771,766	0	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 248 asset managers. See all 248 in the interactive database.

12. 7. Shareholder proposal regarding Board authorization of an investment in x.AI Corp

Official resultOTHER SOCIAL ISSUESReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 8 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

53.6% Not approved · of votes cast

FOR 53.6%AGAINST

FOR: 1,058,999,435AGAINST: 916,321,296

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 248 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A shareholder proposal regarding Board authorization of an investment in xAl.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“7. Shareholder proposal regarding Board authorization of an investment in x.AI Corp”): 1,058,999,435 for, 916,321,296 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07). This item required more than a simple majority of votes cast — see the filing.

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “Since our bylaws generally consider abstention as votes against, this was not approved under the bylaw standard.”
A stricter vote than a majority of the votes cast may have applied to this item; the filing does not state it.
Support: 53.6% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 248 asset managers below reported 65,754,074 for, 234,996,385 against, 270,996,314 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 6,092 unknown.

AGAINSTABSTAIN

FOR: 65,754,074AGAINST: 234,996,385ABSTAIN: 270,996,314UNKNOWN: 6,092NOT VOTED: 2,191

Largest asset managers voting on “A shareholder proposal regarding Board authorization of an investment in xAl.” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	863	11,185,156	226,329,845	Abstain
Fidelity	0	59,138,442	19,517,742	Mixed
Capital Group	41,653,510	6,652,699	0	Mixed
BlackRock	0	35,276,361	397,915	Against
State Street	0	58,021	21,763,135	Abstain
Charles Schwab	0	18,827,997	0	Against
TIAA	0	12,553,261	0	Against
T. Rowe Price	0	12,348,214	115,572	Against
Invesco	10,887,983	7,342	225,156	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	7,925,136	0	0	For
American Century	0	5,543,914	0	Against
ARK ETF Trust	0	4,567,187	0	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	0	4,303,413	0	Against
Jackson National	0	3,992,593	38,049	Against
Prudential/PGIM	0	3,502,868	0	Against
Loomis Sayles	0	3,380,387	0	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	0	2,818,277	0	Against
Equitable	26,819	2,655,249	60,160	Against
ProShares	0	2,319,052	0	Against
Dimensional	0	2,219,189	0	Against
John Hancock	0	2,032,613	0	Against
Victory Capital	0	2,010,568	0	Against
Brighthouse	0	1,721,208	159,074	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	0	1,811,136	0	Against
Putnam	0	1,771,766	0	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 248 asset managers. See all 248 in the interactive database.

13. 12. Shareholder proposal to elect each director annually

Official resultCORPORATE GOVERNANCEReported outcome: Approved

Combines 4 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

54.3% Approved · of votes cast

FOR 54.3%AGAINST

FOR: 1,328,135,664AGAINST: 1,118,920,427

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 247 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A shareholder proposal to elect each director annually.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“12. Shareholder proposal to elect each director annually”): 1,328,135,664 for, 1,118,920,427 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was approved.”
Support: 54.3% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 247 asset managers below reported 544,513,147 for, 26,199,040 against, 240,365 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 1,148 unknown.

FOR

FOR: 544,513,147AGAINST: 26,199,040ABSTAIN: 240,365NOT VOTED: 2,191UNKNOWN: 1,148

Largest asset managers voting on “A shareholder proposal to elect each director annually.” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	230,473,983	7,041,859	21	For
Fidelity	78,656,184	0	0	For
Capital Group	48,306,209	0	0	For
BlackRock	35,674,276	0	0	For
State Street	21,815,913	5,243	0	For
Charles Schwab	18,813,929	14,068	0	For
TIAA	12,553,261	0	0	For
T. Rowe Price	12,463,786	0	0	For
Invesco	11,120,481	0	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	7,925,136	0	0	For
American Century	518,507	5,025,407	0	Mixed
ARK ETF Trust	0	4,567,187	0	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,303,413	0	0	For
Jackson National	4,030,642	0	0	For
Prudential/PGIM	1,788,076	1,714,792	0	Mixed
Loomis Sayles	3,380,387	0	0	For
Columbia Threadneedle	2,818,277	0	0	For
Equitable	2,729,874	12,354	0	For
ProShares	2,319,052	0	0	For
Dimensional	2,219,189	0	0	For
John Hancock	2,032,613	0	0	For
Victory Capital	2,010,568	0	0	For
Brighthouse	1,528,263	192,945	159,074	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	1,811,136	0	0	For
Putnam	1,771,766	0	0	For

Showing the 25 largest of 247 asset managers. See all 247 in the interactive database.

14. 14. Shareholder proposal to seek shareholder approval before adopting an amendment to the bylaws pursuant to Section…

Official resultCORPORATE GOVERNANCEReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 6 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

49.4% Not approved · of votes cast

FOR 49.4%AGAINST

FOR: 1,205,163,451AGAINST: 1,234,433,868

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 247 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A shareholder proposal to seek shareholder approval before adopting an amendment to the bylaws pursuant to Section 21.373 of the TBOC.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“14. Shareholder proposal to seek shareholder approval before adopting an amendment to the bylaws pursuant to Section 21.373 of the TBOC”): 1,205,163,451 for, 1,234,433,868 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Support: 49.4% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 247 asset managers below reported 456,347,780 for, 114,358,795 against, 240,913 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 4,944 unknown.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 456,347,780AGAINST: 114,358,795ABSTAIN: 240,913UNKNOWN: 4,944NOT VOTED: 2,191

Largest asset managers voting on “A shareholder proposal to seek shareholder approval before adopting an amendment to the bylaws pursuant to Sec” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	229,853,538	7,662,298	29	For
Fidelity	21,296,178	57,360,006	0	Mixed
Capital Group	48,306,209	0	0	For
BlackRock	35,674,276	0	0	For
State Street	21,813,419	7,737	0	For
Charles Schwab	18,813,929	14,068	0	For
TIAA	12,553,261	0	0	For
T. Rowe Price	0	12,463,786	0	Against
Invesco	10,895,325	225,156	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	0	7,925,136	0	Against
American Century	429,600	5,114,314	0	Mixed
ARK ETF Trust	0	4,567,187	0	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,303,413	0	0	For
Jackson National	3,256,120	774,522	0	Mixed
Prudential/PGIM	1,624,976	1,877,892	0	Mixed
Loomis Sayles	0	3,380,387	0	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	2,818,277	0	0	For
Equitable	2,482,453	259,775	0	Mixed
ProShares	2,319,052	0	0	For
Dimensional	2,219,189	0	0	For
John Hancock	1,446,951	585,662	0	Mixed
Victory Capital	1,770,878	239,690	0	Mixed
Brighthouse	765,021	956,187	159,074	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	1,811,136	0	0	For
Putnam	0	1,771,766	0	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 247 asset managers. See all 247 in the interactive database.

15. 9. Shareholder proposal requesting a child labor audit

Official resultHUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCEReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 6 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

8% Not approved · of votes cast

8%AGAINST

FOR: 188,709,041AGAINST: 2,238,338,124

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 247 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A shareholder proposal requesting a child labor audit.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“9. Shareholder proposal requesting a child labor audit”): 188,709,041 for, 2,238,338,124 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Support: 8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 247 asset managers below reported 3,222,414 for, 567,159,010 against, 1,414,891 abstained, 2,191 not voted, 6,092 unknown.

AGAINST

FOR: 3,222,414AGAINST: 567,159,010ABSTAIN: 1,414,891UNKNOWN: 6,092NOT VOTED: 2,191

Largest asset managers voting on “A shareholder proposal requesting a child labor audit.” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	186	237,515,635	41	Against
Fidelity	0	78,656,184	0	Against
Capital Group	0	48,306,209	0	Against
BlackRock	0	35,674,276	0	Against
State Street	7,175	21,813,981	0	Against
Charles Schwab	0	18,827,997	0	Against
TIAA	0	12,553,261	0	Against
T. Rowe Price	0	12,463,786	0	Against
Invesco	0	11,120,481	0	Against
BARON SELECT FUNDS	0	7,925,136	0	Against
American Century	0	5,543,914	0	Against
ARK ETF Trust	0	4,567,187	0	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	0	4,303,413	0	Against
Jackson National	0	4,030,642	0	Against
Prudential/PGIM	0	3,502,868	0	Against
Loomis Sayles	0	3,380,387	0	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	0	2,818,277	0	Against
Equitable	9,755	2,732,473	0	Against
ProShares	0	2,319,052	0	Against
Dimensional	0	2,219,189	0	Against
John Hancock	0	2,032,613	0	Against
Victory Capital	0	2,010,568	0	Against
Brighthouse	0	1,677,563	202,719	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	0	1,811,136	0	Against
Putnam	0	1,771,766	0	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 247 asset managers. See all 247 in the interactive database.

16. 13. Shareholder proposal regarding a proposal, which won 54% support at our 2024 annual meeting

Official resultCORPORATE GOVERNANCEReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 4 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

32% Not approved · of votes cast

FOR 32%AGAINST

FOR: 787,399,596AGAINST: 1,648,698,264

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 246 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A shareholder proposal regarding proposal that won 54% support at 2024 Tesla annual meeting.

Tesla, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“13. Shareholder proposal regarding a proposal, which won 54% support at our 2024 annual meeting”): 787,399,596 for, 1,648,698,264 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed November 7, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Support: 32% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 246 asset managers below reported 206,891,511 for, 363,725,393 against, 246,631 abstained, 2,191 not voted.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 206,891,511AGAINST: 363,725,393ABSTAIN: 246,631NOT VOTED: 2,191

Largest asset managers voting on “A shareholder proposal regarding proposal that won 54% support at 2024 Tesla annual meeting.” at Tesla, Inc., 2025-2026
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	4,827,864	232,687,969	29	Against
Fidelity	77,184,434	1,471,750	0	For
Capital Group	0	48,306,209	0	Against
BlackRock	0	35,674,276	0	Against
State Street	21,815,913	5,243	0	For
Charles Schwab	18,813,929	14,068	0	For
TIAA	12,553,261	0	0	For
T. Rowe Price	12,463,786	0	0	For
Invesco	11,120,481	0	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	0	7,925,136	0	Against
American Century	518,507	5,025,407	0	Mixed
ARK ETF Trust	0	4,567,187	0	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	0	4,303,413	0	Against
Jackson National	3,480,364	550,278	0	Mixed
Prudential/PGIM	1,479,519	2,023,349	0	Mixed
Loomis Sayles	0	3,380,387	0	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	2,818,277	0	0	For
Equitable	1,463,153	1,279,075	0	Mixed
ProShares	2,319,052	0	0	For
Dimensional	2,219,189	0	0	For
John Hancock	2,032,613	0	0	For
Victory Capital	1,770,878	239,690	0	Mixed
Brighthouse	795,183	926,025	159,074	Mixed
Six Circles Trust	0	1,811,136	0	Against
Putnam	1,771,766	0	0	For

Showing the 25 largest of 246 asset managers. See all 246 in the interactive database.

Not shown here: this season’s fund filings also report 1 item from the meeting of June 13, 2024, which belongs to the 2023-2024 season. A meeting outside this season’s July 1 to June 30 window is not counted in this page’s items or in its totals of asset managers and fund votes.

Largest Tesla, Inc. shareholders voting in 2025-2026

Ranked separately for each type of Form N-PX report. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two tables can list the same shares and are never added together. Each is ranked by the shares voted on the item that the most managers of that type reported, shown as a share of the 3,324,000,000 shares outstanding at the time of that meeting.

Fund voting reports: top Tesla, Inc. shareholders by shares voted on “A Tesla proposal for a non-binding advisory vote approving 2024 executive compensation.”, 2025-2026
#	Asset manager	% of shares outstanding
1	Vanguard	7.15%
2	Fidelity	2.37%
3	Capital Group	1.45%
4	BlackRock	1.07%
5	State Street	0.66%
6	Charles Schwab	0.57%
7	TIAA	0.38%
8	T. Rowe Price	0.37%
9	Invesco	0.33%
10	BARON SELECT FUNDS	0.24%

Institutional-manager reports: top Tesla, Inc. shareholders by shares voted on “A Tesla proposal for a non-binding advisory vote approving 2024 executive compensation.”, 2025-2026
#	Asset manager	% of shares outstanding
1	BlackRock	3.31%
2	State Street	2.00%
3	GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC	1.96%
4	Capital Group	1.40%
5	T. Rowe Price	0.91%
6	Vanguard	0.84%
7	Fidelity	0.80%
8	Northern Trust	0.69%
9	Amundi	0.64%
10	Charles Schwab	0.59%

Reported Tesla, Inc. holdings and ownership

As disclosed to the SEC in Form 13F (quarter-end holdings of 30 large managers), Schedules 13D and 13G (beneficial ownership above 5%) and the company’s own proxy statement (DEF 14A). Each row names its form.

Tesla, Inc. holdings and ownership disclosed for the 2025-2026 proxy season
Holder	% outstanding	Disclosure
Elon Musk	21.58%	DEF14A
Elon R. Musk	21.05%	13G
Vanguard Group	7.79%	13F
BlackRock	6.26%	13F
State Street	3.45%	13F
Citadel Advisors	1.92%	13F
JPMorgan Chase	1.39%	13F
FMR (Fidelity)	1.08%	13F
Morgan Stanley	1.08%	13F
Goldman Sachs	1.03%	13F

Percentages above are of 3,324,000,000 shares outstanding, as reported by Tesla, Inc. on its Form 10-Q dated September 30, 2025 (see the filing on EDGAR). This is the count contemporaneous with the 2025-2026 meeting, not today’s. Each holding is as of its own filing, which may be dated before or after the meeting.

About this page

Every figure above is derived from filings made with the US Securities and Exchange Commission: Form N-PX, in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes), and Form 8-K Item 5.07, in which the company reports its own meeting results. Shares outstanding are taken from Tesla, Inc.’s 10-Q dated September 30, 2025. This page is a static snapshot rebuilt weekly on October 18, 2026; a live search always shows the current data.

At Tesla, Inc.'s shareholder meeting held November 6, 2025, in the 2025-2026 proxy season, 1,559 asset managers reported how they voted on 16 ballot items in their SEC Form N-PX filings, covering 24,556 separate fund positions. On the most widely held item on that ballot — A Tesla proposal for a non-binding advisory vote approving 2024 executive compensation. — Tesla, Inc.'s filing reports the proposal as approved, with 79% support of the votes cast (FOR divided by FOR plus AGAINST, the conventional basis for proxy support; abstentions, broker non-votes and unvoted shares are excluded because none of them took a side). Source: Tesla, Inc.'s Form 8-K, Item 5.07, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2025.

Tesla, Inc. proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2025-2026 (this page).

Download data (CSV): ballot items · votes by manager · column guide.