Home › Companies › TESLA INC. › 2023-2024

TESLA INC. 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Compiled from SEC Form N-PX filings and TESLA INC.’s Form 8-K, filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07 on EDGAR). Page generated October 25, 2026.

13Ballot items
1,404Asset managers
17,083Fund votes
June 13, 2024Meeting date

Results at a glance

Meeting of June 13, 2024: 13 items on TESLA INC.’s Form 8-K, filed June 14, 2024: 2 elected · 6 approved · 5 not approved.

Material dissent

Elect Director: James Murdoch 69% of votes cast Elected Director under 80%
Elect Director: Kimbal Musk 79% of votes cast Elected Director under 80%
6. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding reduction of director terms to one year 54.1% of votes cast Approved Shareholder proposal won a majority
4. Management proposal to ratify the 100% performance-based stock option award to Elon Musk that was proposed to and approved by our… 77% of votes cast Approved Under 80%
7. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding simple majority voting provisions in our governing documents 53.9% of votes cast Approved Shareholder proposal won a majority

Material dissent: a director nominee under 80% of the votes cast, say-on-pay under 70%, any other item the board put forward under 80%, or a shareholder proposal with more than 50%, on the company’s own Form 8-K tally. How this is decided

Proxy season: 2023-2024 2025-2026

Explore TESLA INC. in the interactive database Compare manager voting policies

Official 2023-2024 meeting results reported by TESLA INC.

These tallies are TESLA INC.’s own, as disclosed to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K, filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07, “Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders”). They cover every share voted at the meeting, not just the funds that file Form N-PX.

TESLA INC. — official shareholder meeting results, meeting held June 13, 2024
Ballot item	For	Against	Abstain	Withheld	Broker non-votes	Support (of votes cast)	Reported outcome	Voting standard
Elect Director: James Murdoch	1,568,468,453	710,657,343	31,143,094	--	335,111,943	69%	Elected	—
Elect Director: Kimbal Musk	1,814,064,783	468,987,640	27,216,467	--	335,111,943	79%	Elected	—
2. Management proposal to approve executive compensation on a non-binding advisory basis	1,834,794,743	449,639,303	25,834,844	--	335,111,943	80%	Approved	—
3. Management proposal to approve the redomestication of Tesla from Delaware to Texas by conversion	2,000,873,803	293,910,071	15,485,016	--	335,111,943	87%	Approved	a majority of the shares outstanding
4. Management proposal to ratify the 100% performance-based stock option award to Elon Musk that was proposed to and approved by our stockholders in 2018	1,760,780,650	528,908,419	--	--	335,111,943	77%	Approved	a majority of the shares outstanding
5. Management proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024	2,545,112,670	66,178,057	34,090,106	--	0	97%	Approved	—
6. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding reduction of director terms to one year	1,231,680,337	1,044,766,276	33,822,277	--	335,111,943	54.1%	Approved	—
7. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding simple majority voting provisions in our governing documents	1,225,968,057	1,047,335,839	36,964,994	--	335,111,943	53.9%	Approved	—
8. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding annual reporting on anti-harassment and discrimination efforts	712,788,260	1,547,103,308	50,377,322	--	335,111,943	32%	Not approved	—
9. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding adoption of a freedom of association and collective bargaining policy	462,903,318	1,783,899,772	63,465,800	--	335,111,943	21%	Not approved	—
10. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding reporting on effects and risks associated with electromagnetic radiation and wireless technologies	84,116,666	2,156,432,223	69,720,001	--	335,111,943	4%	Not approved	—
11. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of integrating sustainability metrics into senior executive compensation plans	229,393,871	2,025,404,233	55,470,786	--	335,111,943	10%	Not approved	—
12. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding committing to a moratorium on sourcing minerals from deep sea mining	172,864,517	2,071,493,645	65,910,728	--	335,111,943	8%	Not approved	—

This meeting is also recorded here as June 14, 2024; both records come from the same filing, so the date should be checked against it.

Source: TESLA INC., Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 14, 2024 — read the filing on EDGAR.

How asset managers voted at the TESLA INC. 2023-2024 meeting

Each item below shows how the 1,404 asset managers that disclosed a TESLA INC. vote in their SEC Form N-PX filings actually voted. Share totals are the shares those managers' funds voted, summed across every fund they report.

1. Elect Director: James Murdoch

Official resultDIRECTOR ELECTIONSReported outcome: Elected

Combines 9 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

69% Majority: yes · of votes cast

FOR 69%AGAINST

FOR: 1,568,468,453AGAINST: 710,657,343

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 215 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: Election of Class II Directors to serve for a three-year term expiring in 2027: James Murdoch

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: James Murdoch”): 1,568,468,453 for, 710,657,343 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 The individuals listed below were elected as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting to serve on Tesla's Board of Directors (" Board ") for a term of three years or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.”
Support: 69% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 399,179,110 for, 176,853,176 against, 198,936 abstained, 741 not voted.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 399,179,110AGAINST: 176,853,176ABSTAIN: 198,936NOT VOTED: 741

Largest asset managers voting on “Election of Class II Directors to serve for a three-year term expiring in 2027: James Murdoch” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Vote
Vanguard	235,362,857	452,972	For
Fidelity	52,106,094	16,101,632	Mixed
BlackRock	62,820	58,225,540	Against
Capital Group	42,113,579	0	For
State Street	30,996	21,882,226	Against
Charles Schwab	15,564,988	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	12,278,366	0	For
JPMorgan	0	10,992,990	Against
TIAA	0	10,359,885	Against
T. Rowe Price	0	9,317,757	Against
Invesco	0	5,766,082	Against
American Century	3,943,128	1,764,513	Mixed
ARK ETF Trust	5,258,507	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	0	4,181,920	Against
Loomis Sayles	3,981,291	0	For
Jackson National	3,518,991	379,772	Mixed
Dimensional	0	3,257,746	Against
Prudential/PGIM	2,908,562	297,432	Mixed
Equitable	328,981	2,636,874	Mixed
ProShares	0	2,456,263	Against
HARBOR FUNDS	2,449,788	0	For
Virtus	380,275	2,017,712	Mixed
Franklin Custodian Funds	0	2,273,483	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	0	2,256,046	Against
Victory Capital	239,690	1,836,118	Mixed

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

2. Elect Director: Kimbal Musk

Official resultDIRECTOR ELECTIONSReported outcome: Elected

Combines 9 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

79% Majority: yes · of votes cast

FOR 79%AGAINST

FOR: 1,814,064,783AGAINST: 468,987,640

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 214 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: Election of Class II Directors to serve for a three-year term expiring in 2027: Kimbal Musk

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Kimbal Musk”): 1,814,064,783 for, 468,987,640 against, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1 The individuals listed below were elected as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting to serve on Tesla's Board of Directors (" Board ") for a term of three years or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.”
Support: 79% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 214 asset managers below reported 457,016,771 for, 118,942,353 against, 197,098 abstained, 741 not voted.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 457,016,771AGAINST: 118,942,353ABSTAIN: 197,098NOT VOTED: 741

Largest asset managers voting on “Election of Class II Directors to serve for a three-year term expiring in 2027: Kimbal Musk” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Vote
Vanguard	235,793,757	22,072	For
Fidelity	52,942,428	15,265,298	Mixed
BlackRock	58,166,482	121,878	For
Capital Group	41,865,406	248,173	For
State Street	53,983	21,859,239	Against
Charles Schwab	0	15,564,988	Against
BARON SELECT FUNDS	12,278,366	0	For
JPMorgan	0	10,992,990	Against
TIAA	0	10,359,885	Against
T. Rowe Price	0	9,317,757	Against
Invesco	5,766,082	0	For
American Century	3,943,128	1,764,513	Mixed
ARK ETF Trust	5,258,507	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,181,920	0	For
Loomis Sayles	0	3,981,291	Against
Jackson National	3,470,509	428,254	Mixed
Dimensional	0	3,257,746	Against
Prudential/PGIM	1,418,457	1,787,537	Mixed
Equitable	1,008,629	1,957,226	Mixed
ProShares	2,456,263	0	For
HARBOR FUNDS	2,449,788	0	For
Virtus	2,108,499	289,488	Mixed
Franklin Custodian Funds	0	2,273,483	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	0	2,256,046	Against
Victory Capital	0	2,075,808	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 214 asset managers. See all 214 in the interactive database.

3. 6. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding reduction of director terms to one year

Official resultDIRECTOR ELECTIONSReported outcome: Approved

Combines 8 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

54.1% Approved · of votes cast

FOR 54.1%AGAINST

FOR: 1,231,680,337AGAINST: 1,044,766,276

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 208 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A stockholder proposal regarding reduction of director terms to one year, if properly presented.

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“6. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding reduction of director terms to one year”): 1,231,680,337 for, 1,044,766,276 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was approved.”
Support: 54.1% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 208 asset managers below reported 485,705,737 for, 27,363,190 against, 190,765 abstained, 741 not voted, 2 unknown.

FOR

FOR: 485,705,737AGAINST: 27,363,190ABSTAIN: 190,765NOT VOTED: 741UNKNOWN: 2

Largest asset managers voting on “A stockholder proposal regarding reduction of director terms to one year, if properly presented.” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	228,304,041	7,511,788	0	For
Fidelity	67,764,747	442,979	0	For
Capital Group	42,113,579	0	0	For
State Street	21,882,226	30,996	0	For
Charles Schwab	15,564,988	0	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	12,278,366	0	0	For
JPMorgan	10,992,990	0	0	For
TIAA	10,359,885	0	0	For
T. Rowe Price	9,317,757	0	0	For
Invesco	5,766,082	0	0	For
American Century	1,764,513	3,943,128	0	Mixed
ARK ETF Trust	0	5,258,507	0	Against
Loomis Sayles	0	3,981,291	0	Against
Jackson National	3,694,284	204,479	0	Mixed
Dimensional	3,257,746	0	0	For
Prudential/PGIM	3,205,994	0	0	For
Equitable	2,649,174	316,681	0	Mixed
ProShares	2,456,263	0	0	For
HARBOR FUNDS	2,448,642	1,146	0	For
Virtus	2,017,712	380,275	0	Mixed
Franklin Custodian Funds	2,273,483	0	0	For
Columbia Threadneedle	2,256,046	0	0	For
Victory Capital	1,836,118	239,690	0	Mixed
Global X	2,056,903	0	0	For
Brighthouse	886,219	920,961	187,616	Mixed

Showing the 25 largest of 208 asset managers. See all 208 in the interactive database.

4. 3. Management proposal to approve the redomestication of Tesla from Delaware to Texas by conversion

Official resultCORPORATE GOVERNANCEReported outcome: Approved

Combines 6 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

87% Approved · of votes cast

FOR 87%

FOR: 2,000,873,803AGAINST: 293,910,071

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 210 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A Tesla proposal to approve the redomestication of Tesla from Delaware to Texas by conversion.

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“3. Management proposal to approve the redomestication of Tesla from Delaware to Texas by conversion”): 2,000,873,803 for, 293,910,071 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was approved.”
Support: 87% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the shares outstanding (“majority of outstanding”).

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of TESLA INC.’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Change State of Incorporation from Delaware to Texas” (8 managers, Fund and manager reports combined; may count the same shares twice; no share total shown).

The 210 asset managers below reported 500,087,189 for, 75,439,096 against, 189,128 abstained, 741 not voted.

FOR

FOR: 500,087,189AGAINST: 75,439,096ABSTAIN: 189,128NOT VOTED: 741

Largest asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal to approve the redomestication of Tesla from Delaware to Texas by conversion.” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Vote
Vanguard	233,010,574	2,805,255	For
Fidelity	54,275,689	13,932,037	Mixed
BlackRock	58,258,116	30,244	For
Capital Group	36,493,345	5,620,234	Mixed
State Street	21,913,222	0	For
Charles Schwab	0	15,564,988	Against
BARON SELECT FUNDS	12,278,366	0	For
JPMorgan	5,326,464	5,666,526	Mixed
TIAA	0	10,359,885	Against
T. Rowe Price	9,317,757	0	For
Invesco	5,766,082	0	For
American Century	5,516,455	191,186	For
ARK ETF Trust	5,258,507	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,181,920	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,981,291	0	For
Jackson National	3,762,088	136,675	For
Dimensional	0	3,257,746	Against
Prudential/PGIM	1,715,889	1,490,105	Mixed
Equitable	1,476,632	1,489,223	Mixed
ProShares	2,456,263	0	For
HARBOR FUNDS	2,449,788	0	For
Virtus	461,705	1,936,282	Mixed
Franklin Custodian Funds	0	2,273,483	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	2,256,046	0	For
Victory Capital	2,075,808	0	For

Showing the 25 largest of 210 asset managers. See all 210 in the interactive database.

5. 4. Management proposal to ratify the 100% performance-based stock option award to Elon Musk that was proposed to and…

Official resultCOMPENSATIONReported outcome: Approved

Combines 21 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

77% Approved · of votes cast

FOR 77%AGAINST

FOR: 1,760,780,650AGAINST: 528,908,419

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 255 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A Tesla proposal to ratify the 100% performance-based stock option award to Elon Musk that was proposed to and approved by our stockholders in 2018.

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“4. Management proposal to ratify the 100% performance-based stock option award to Elon Musk that was proposed to and approved by our stockholders in 2018”): 1,760,780,650 for, 528,908,419 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was approved.”
Support: 77% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the shares outstanding (“majority of the voting power”).

The 255 asset managers below reported 491,850,877 for, 82,445,776 against, 5,981,078 abstained, 741 not voted.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 491,850,877AGAINST: 82,445,776ABSTAIN: 5,981,078NOT VOTED: 741

Largest asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal to ratify the 100% performance-based stock option award to Elon Musk that was proposed to and” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	235,362,857	452,972	0	For
Fidelity	67,690,284	517,442	0	For
BlackRock	58,144,118	144,242	0	For
Capital Group	36,493,345	5,620,234	0	Mixed
State Street	30,996	21,882,226	0	Against
Charles Schwab	0	15,564,988	0	Against
BARON SELECT FUNDS	12,278,366	0	0	For
JPMorgan	10,992,990	0	0	For
TIAA	10,359,885	0	0	For
T. Rowe Price	4,064,485	44,175	5,209,097	Mixed
Invesco	5,766,082	0	0	For
American Century	5,516,455	191,186	0	For
ARK ETF Trust	5,258,507	0	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,181,920	0	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,981,291	0	0	For
Jackson National	3,806,612	92,151	0	For
Dimensional	0	3,257,746	0	Against
Prudential/PGIM	1,659,789	1,546,205	0	Mixed
Equitable	1,492,828	1,473,027	0	Mixed
ProShares	0	2,456,263	0	Against
HARBOR FUNDS	2,449,788	0	0	For
Virtus	669,472	1,728,515	0	Mixed
Franklin Custodian Funds	0	2,273,483	0	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	2,256,046	0	0	For
Victory Capital	247,204	1,828,604	0	Mixed

Showing the 25 largest of 255 asset managers. See all 255 in the interactive database.

6. 2. Management proposal to approve executive compensation on a non-binding advisory basis

Official result Fund totals may overlapSECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESReported outcome: Approved

Combines 39 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

80% Approved · of votes cast

FOR 80%AGAINST

FOR: 1,834,794,743AGAINST: 449,639,303

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 1,375 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A Tesla proposal to approve executive compensation on a non- binding advisory basis.

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“2. Management proposal to approve executive compensation on a non-binding advisory basis”): 1,834,794,743 for, 449,639,303 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was approved.”
Support: 80% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports: 196 asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal to approve executive compensation on a non- binding advisory basis.” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Vote
Vanguard	235,362,857	452,972	For
Fidelity	67,690,284	517,442	For
BlackRock	58,206,938	81,422	For
Capital Group	41,865,406	248,173	For
State Street	30,996	21,882,226	Against
Charles Schwab	15,564,988	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	12,278,366	0	For
JPMorgan	10,992,990	0	For
TIAA	0	10,359,885	Against
T. Rowe Price	9,317,757	0	For
Invesco	5,766,082	0	For
American Century	5,516,455	191,186	For
ARK ETF Trust	5,258,507	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,181,920	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,981,291	0	For
Jackson National	3,806,612	92,151	For
Dimensional	0	3,257,746	Against
Prudential/PGIM	3,149,894	56,100	For
Equitable	1,492,828	1,473,027	Mixed
ProShares	0	2,456,263	Against
HARBOR FUNDS	2,449,788	0	For
Virtus	669,472	1,728,515	Mixed
Franklin Custodian Funds	2,273,483	0	For
Columbia Threadneedle	2,256,046	0	For
Victory Capital	247,204	1,828,604	Mixed

Fund voting reports, all 196 managers: 514,900,685 for, 60,605,582 against, 189,992 abstained, 741 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports: 1,206 asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal to approve executive compensation on a non- binding advisory basis.” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Paragon Capital Management LLC	0	113,000,000	0	Against
BlackRock	85,979,754	1,465,814	0	For
State Street	52,796	65,254,162	0	Against
GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC	56,932,899	0	0	For
Capital Group	46,385,151	25,257	0	For
Northern Trust	21,977,871	2,594,517	15	Mixed
T. Rowe Price	22,346,716	0	0	For
Fidelity	18,410,687	77,345	0	For
Charles Schwab	15,895,876	0	0	For
MELLON INVESTMENTS Corp	15,177,277	1,329	0	For
Legal & General Investment Management Ltd	0	13,893,242	0	Against
BAMCO INC /NY/	12,641,261	0	0	For
Baron Financial Group, LLC	12,500,000	0	0	For
Vanguard	12,347,406	0	0	For
Nuveen	0	11,010,345	0	Against
UBS	0	10,071,422	0	Against
PRIMECAP MANAGEMENT CO/CA/	8,890,480	0	0	For
JENNISON ASSOCIATES LLC	8,638,048	10,792	0	For
Goldman Sachs	12,020	7,871,581	0	Against
Invesco	7,691,025	0	0	For
Amundi	0	7,643,126	0	Against
PARAMETRIC PORTFOLIO ASSOCIATES LLC	0	7,424,384	0	Against
National Pension Service	6,555,327	0	0	For
BAILLIE GIFFORD OVERSEAS LTD	6,488,444	5,505	0	For
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Asset Management Co., Ltd.	0	6,490,073	0	Against

Institutional-manager reports, all 1,206 managers: 429,708,045 for, 352,211,173 against, 7,130 withheld, 718,852 abstained, 163,243 not voted, 22,206 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

7. 5. Management proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered…

Official resultAUDIT-RELATEDReported outcome: Approved

Combines 12 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

97% Approved · of votes cast

FOR 97%

FOR: 2,545,112,670AGAINST: 66,178,057

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 218 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A Tesla proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Tesla's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“5. Management proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024”): 2,545,112,670 for, 66,178,057 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was approved.”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 218 asset managers below reported 575,762,465 for, 474,651 against, 203,812 abstained, 741 not voted, 600 unknown.

FOR

FOR: 575,762,465AGAINST: 474,651ABSTAIN: 203,812NOT VOTED: 741UNKNOWN: 600

Largest asset managers voting on “A Tesla proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Tesla's independent registered pub” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Vote
Vanguard	235,815,829	0	For
Fidelity	68,207,726	0	For
BlackRock	58,288,360	0	For
Capital Group	42,113,579	0	For
State Street	21,906,590	6,632	For
Charles Schwab	15,564,988	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	12,278,366	0	For
JPMorgan	10,992,990	0	For
TIAA	10,359,885	0	For
T. Rowe Price	9,317,757	0	For
Invesco	5,766,082	0	For
American Century	5,707,641	0	For
ARK ETF Trust	5,258,507	0	For
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,181,920	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,981,291	0	For
Jackson National	3,898,763	0	For
Dimensional	3,257,746	0	For
Prudential/PGIM	3,205,994	0	For
Equitable	2,965,855	0	For
ProShares	2,456,263	0	For
HARBOR FUNDS	2,449,788	0	For
Virtus	2,397,987	0	For
Franklin Custodian Funds	2,273,483	0	For
Columbia Threadneedle	2,256,046	0	For
Victory Capital	2,075,808	0	For

Showing the 25 largest of 218 asset managers. See all 218 in the interactive database.

8. 11. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the…

Official resultCOMPENSATIONReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 14 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

10% Not approved · of votes cast

10%AGAINST

FOR: 229,393,871AGAINST: 2,025,404,233

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 247 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A stockholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of integrating sustainability metrics into senior executive compensation plans, if properly presented.

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“11. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of integrating sustainability metrics into senior executive compensation plans”): 229,393,871 for, 2,025,404,233 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Support: 10% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 247 asset managers below reported 11,276,403 for, 564,137,757 against, 1,385,503 abstained, 2,022 not voted, 602 unknown.

AGAINST

FOR: 11,276,403AGAINST: 564,137,757ABSTAIN: 1,385,503NOT VOTED: 2,022UNKNOWN: 602

Largest asset managers voting on “A stockholder proposal regarding adopting targets and reporting on metrics to assess the feasibility of integr” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Vote
Vanguard	22,072	235,793,757	Against
Fidelity	0	68,207,726	Against
BlackRock	43,116	58,245,244	Against
Capital Group	0	42,113,579	Against
State Street	49,246	21,863,976	Against
Charles Schwab	0	15,564,988	Against
BARON SELECT FUNDS	0	12,278,366	Against
JPMorgan	0	10,992,990	Against
TIAA	0	10,359,885	Against
T. Rowe Price	0	9,317,757	Against
Invesco	0	5,766,082	Against
American Century	0	5,707,641	Against
ARK ETF Trust	0	5,258,507	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	0	4,181,920	Against
Loomis Sayles	0	3,981,291	Against
Jackson National	54,200	3,844,563	Against
Dimensional	0	3,257,746	Against
Prudential/PGIM	56,100	3,149,894	Against
Equitable	29,628	2,936,227	Against
ProShares	0	2,456,263	Against
HARBOR FUNDS	0	2,449,788	Against
Virtus	1,647,376	750,611	Mixed
Franklin Custodian Funds	0	2,273,483	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	0	2,256,046	Against
Victory Capital	1,828,604	247,204	Mixed

Showing the 25 largest of 247 asset managers. See all 247 in the interactive database.

9. 10. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding reporting on effects and risks associated with electromagnetic…

Official resultENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATEReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 9 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

4% Not approved · of votes cast

AGAINST

FOR: 84,116,666AGAINST: 2,156,432,223

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 215 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A stockholder proposal regarding reporting on effects and risks associated with electromagnetic radiation and wireless technologies, if properly presented.

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“10. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding reporting on effects and risks associated with electromagnetic radiation and wireless technologies”): 84,116,666 for, 2,156,432,223 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Support: 4% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 526,130 for, 574,396,591 against, 1,392,703 abstained, 741 not voted, 602 unknown.

AGAINST

FOR: 526,130AGAINST: 574,396,591ABSTAIN: 1,392,703NOT VOTED: 741UNKNOWN: 602

Largest asset managers voting on “A stockholder proposal regarding reporting on effects and risks associated with electromagnetic radiation and ” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	Against	Vote
Vanguard	235,815,829	Against
Fidelity	68,207,726	Against
BlackRock	58,288,360	Against
Capital Group	42,113,579	Against
State Street	21,913,222	Against
Charles Schwab	15,564,988	Against
BARON SELECT FUNDS	12,278,366	Against
JPMorgan	10,992,990	Against
TIAA	10,359,885	Against
T. Rowe Price	9,317,757	Against
Invesco	5,766,082	Against
American Century	5,707,641	Against
ARK ETF Trust	5,258,507	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,181,920	Against
Loomis Sayles	3,981,291	Against
Jackson National	3,898,763	Against
Dimensional	3,257,746	Against
Prudential/PGIM	3,205,994	Against
Equitable	2,965,855	Against
ProShares	2,456,263	Against
HARBOR FUNDS	2,449,788	Against
Virtus	2,397,987	Against
Franklin Custodian Funds	2,273,483	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	2,256,046	Against
Victory Capital	2,075,808	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

10. 12. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding committing to a moratorium on sourcing minerals from deep sea…

Official resultENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATEReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 8 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

8% Not approved · of votes cast

8%AGAINST

FOR: 172,864,517AGAINST: 2,071,493,645

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 215 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A stockholder proposal regarding committing to a moratorium on sourcing minerals from deep sea mining, if properly presented.

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“12. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding committing to a moratorium on sourcing minerals from deep sea mining”): 172,864,517 for, 2,071,493,645 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Support: 8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 7,575,436 for, 567,379,310 against, 1,387,278 abstained, 741 not voted, 2 unknown.

AGAINST

FOR: 7,575,436AGAINST: 567,379,310ABSTAIN: 1,387,278NOT VOTED: 741UNKNOWN: 2

Largest asset managers voting on “A stockholder proposal regarding committing to a moratorium on sourcing minerals from deep sea mining, if prop” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Vote
Vanguard	4,546,762	231,269,067	Against
Fidelity	0	68,207,726	Against
BlackRock	59,058	58,229,302	Against
Capital Group	0	42,113,579	Against
State Street	28,089	21,885,133	Against
Charles Schwab	0	15,564,988	Against
BARON SELECT FUNDS	0	12,278,366	Against
JPMorgan	0	10,992,990	Against
TIAA	0	10,359,885	Against
T. Rowe Price	0	9,317,757	Against
Invesco	0	5,766,082	Against
American Century	0	5,707,641	Against
ARK ETF Trust	0	5,258,507	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	0	4,181,920	Against
Loomis Sayles	0	3,981,291	Against
Jackson National	66,499	3,832,264	Against
Dimensional	0	3,257,746	Against
Prudential/PGIM	0	3,205,994	Against
Equitable	13,281	2,952,574	Against
ProShares	0	2,456,263	Against
HARBOR FUNDS	0	2,449,788	Against
Virtus	0	2,397,987	Against
Franklin Custodian Funds	0	2,273,483	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	0	2,256,046	Against
Victory Capital	0	2,075,808	Against

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

11. 8. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding annual reporting on anti-harassment and discrimination efforts

Official resultHUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCEReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 10 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

32% Not approved · of votes cast

FOR 32%AGAINST

FOR: 712,788,260AGAINST: 1,547,103,308

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 215 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A stockholder proposal regarding annual reporting on anti- harassment and discrimination efforts, if properly presented.

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“8. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding annual reporting on anti-harassment and discrimination efforts”): 712,788,260 for, 1,547,103,308 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Support: 32% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 160,722,146 for, 414,315,829 against, 1,391,051 abstained, 741 not voted, 2 unknown.

FORAGAINST

FOR: 160,722,146AGAINST: 414,315,829ABSTAIN: 1,391,051NOT VOTED: 741UNKNOWN: 2

Largest asset managers voting on “A stockholder proposal regarding annual reporting on anti- harassment and discrimination efforts, if properly ” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Vote
Vanguard	4,999,734	230,816,095	Against
Fidelity	1,797,051	66,410,675	Against
BlackRock	58,217,478	70,882	For
Capital Group	248,173	41,865,406	Against
State Street	68,102	21,845,120	Against
Charles Schwab	15,564,988	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	0	12,278,366	Against
JPMorgan	10,992,990	0	For
TIAA	10,359,885	0	For
T. Rowe Price	674	9,317,083	Against
Invesco	5,412,215	353,867	Mixed
American Century	1,764,513	3,943,128	Mixed
ARK ETF Trust	0	5,258,507	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	4,181,920	0	For
Loomis Sayles	3,981,291	0	For
Jackson National	529,396	3,369,367	Mixed
Dimensional	0	3,257,746	Against
Prudential/PGIM	1,563,040	1,642,954	Mixed
Equitable	2,907,595	58,260	For
ProShares	2,456,263	0	For
HARBOR FUNDS	0	2,449,788	Against
Virtus	2,397,987	0	For
Franklin Custodian Funds	2,273,483	0	For
Columbia Threadneedle	1,261,549	994,497	Mixed
Victory Capital	2,075,808	0	For

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

12. 9. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding adoption of a freedom of association and collective bargaining…

Official resultHUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCEReported outcome: Not approved

Combines 9 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

21% Not approved · of votes cast

FOR 21%AGAINST

FOR: 462,903,318AGAINST: 1,783,899,772

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 215 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A stockholder proposal regarding adoption of a freedom of association and collective bargaining policy, if properly presented.

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“9. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding adoption of a freedom of association and collective bargaining policy”): 462,903,318 for, 1,783,899,772 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was not approved.”
Support: 21% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 215 asset managers below reported 48,897,673 for, 526,046,490 against, 1,463,463 abstained, 741 not voted, 2 unknown.

AGAINST

FOR: 48,897,673AGAINST: 526,046,490ABSTAIN: 1,463,463NOT VOTED: 741UNKNOWN: 2

Largest asset managers voting on “A stockholder proposal regarding adoption of a freedom of association and collective bargaining policy, if pro” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Vote
Vanguard	452,972	235,362,857	Against
Fidelity	233,000	67,974,726	Against
BlackRock	73,360	58,215,000	Against
Capital Group	0	42,113,579	Against
State Street	68,102	21,845,120	Against
Charles Schwab	0	15,564,988	Against
BARON SELECT FUNDS	0	12,278,366	Against
JPMorgan	0	10,992,990	Against
TIAA	10,359,885	0	For
T. Rowe Price	674	9,317,083	Against
Invesco	5,412,215	353,867	Mixed
American Century	68,752	5,638,889	Against
ARK ETF Trust	0	5,258,507	Against
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO	0	4,181,920	Against
Loomis Sayles	0	3,981,291	Against
Jackson National	0	3,898,763	Against
Dimensional	380,383	2,877,363	Mixed
Prudential/PGIM	1,490,105	1,715,889	Mixed
Equitable	1,472,591	1,493,264	Mixed
ProShares	2,456,263	0	For
HARBOR FUNDS	0	2,449,788	Against
Virtus	2,017,712	380,275	Mixed
Franklin Custodian Funds	2,273,483	0	For
Columbia Threadneedle	1,092,607	1,163,439	Mixed
Victory Capital	1,836,118	239,690	Mixed

Showing the 25 largest of 215 asset managers. See all 215 in the interactive database.

13. 7. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding simple majority voting provisions in our governing documents

Official resultCORPORATE GOVERNANCEReported outcome: Approved

Combines 8 wordings of this item as funds reported it.

53.9% Approved · of votes cast

FOR 53.9%AGAINST

FOR: 1,225,968,057AGAINST: 1,047,335,839

Details: description as filed, official tally, votes by 208 asset managers

Description as filed by funds: A stockholder proposal regarding simple majority voting provisions in our governing documents, if properly presented.

TESLA INC.’s own tally for this item (“7. Non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding simple majority voting provisions in our governing documents”): 1,225,968,057 for, 1,047,335,839 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed June 14, 2024 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “This proposal was approved.”
Support: 53.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of TESLA INC.’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Adopt Simple Majority Vote” (10 managers, 62,980,604 for, 6,998 abstained).

The 208 asset managers below reported 481,976,281 for, 31,082,804 against, 191,043 abstained, 741 not voted, 2 unknown.

FOR

FOR: 481,976,281AGAINST: 31,082,804ABSTAIN: 191,043NOT VOTED: 741UNKNOWN: 2

Largest asset managers voting on “A stockholder proposal regarding simple majority voting provisions in our governing documents, if properly pre” at TESLA INC., 2023-2024
Asset manager	For	Against	Abstain	Vote
Vanguard	228,304,041	7,511,788	0	For
Fidelity	67,317,444	890,282	0	For
Capital Group	42,113,579	0	0	For
State Street	21,882,226	30,996	0	For
Charles Schwab	15,564,988	0	0	For
BARON SELECT FUNDS	12,278,366	0	0	For
JPMorgan	10,992,990	0	0	For
TIAA	10,359,885	0	0	For
T. Rowe Price	44,175	9,273,582	0	Against
Invesco	5,766,082	0	0	For
American Century	1,764,513	3,943,128	0	Mixed
ARK ETF Trust	0	5,258,507	0	Against
Loomis Sayles	3,981,291	0	0	For
Jackson National	3,761,160	137,603	0	For
Dimensional	3,257,746	0	0	For
Prudential/PGIM	2,925,397	280,597	0	Mixed
Equitable	2,965,855	0	0	For
ProShares	2,456,263	0	0	For
HARBOR FUNDS	2,448,642	1,146	0	For
Virtus	2,397,987	0	0	For
Franklin Custodian Funds	2,273,483	0	0	For
Columbia Threadneedle	2,256,046	0	0	For
Victory Capital	2,075,808	0	0	For
Global X	2,056,903	0	0	For
Brighthouse	1,804,346	2,834	187,616	Mixed

Showing the 25 largest of 208 asset managers. See all 208 in the interactive database.

Largest TESLA INC. shareholders voting in 2023-2024

Ranked separately for each type of Form N-PX report. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two tables can list the same shares and are never added together. Each is ranked by the shares voted on the item that the most managers of that type reported, shown as a share of the 3,189,000,000 shares outstanding at the time of that meeting.

Fund voting reports: top TESLA INC. shareholders by shares voted on “A Tesla proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Tesla's independent…”, 2023-2024
#	Asset manager	% of shares outstanding
1	Vanguard	7.39%
2	Fidelity	2.14%
3	BlackRock	1.83%
4	Capital Group	1.32%
5	State Street	0.69%
6	Charles Schwab	0.49%
7	BARON SELECT FUNDS	0.39%
8	JPMorgan	0.34%
9	TIAA	0.32%
10	T. Rowe Price	0.29%

Institutional-manager reports: top TESLA INC. shareholders by shares voted on “A Tesla proposal to approve executive compensation on a non- binding advisory basis.”, 2023-2024
#	Asset manager	% of shares outstanding
1	Paragon Capital Management LLC	3.54%
2	BlackRock	2.74%
3	State Street	2.05%
4	GEODE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC	1.79%
5	Capital Group	1.46%
6	Northern Trust	0.77%
7	T. Rowe Price	0.70%
8	Fidelity	0.58%
9	Charles Schwab	0.50%
10	MELLON INVESTMENTS Corp	0.48%

Reported TESLA INC. holdings and ownership

As disclosed to the SEC in Form 13F (quarter-end holdings of 30 large managers), Schedules 13D and 13G (beneficial ownership above 5%) and the company’s own proxy statement (DEF 14A). Each row names its form.

TESLA INC. holdings and ownership disclosed for the 2023-2024 proxy season
Holder	% outstanding	Disclosure
Elon Musk	22.42%	DEF14A
Elon R. Musk	22.42%	13G
Vanguard Group	7.91%	13F
BlackRock	6.49%	13F
State Street	3.51%	13F
Citadel Advisors	2.28%	13F
Geode Capital	1.78%	13F
JPMorgan Chase	1.40%	13F
Goldman Sachs	1.30%	13F
Morgan Stanley	1.13%	13F

Percentages above are of 3,189,000,000 shares outstanding, as reported by TESLA INC. on its Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2024 (see the filing on EDGAR). This is the count contemporaneous with the 2023-2024 meeting, not today’s. Each holding is as of its own filing, which may be dated before or after the meeting.

About this page

Every figure above is derived from filings made with the US Securities and Exchange Commission: Form N-PX, in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes), and Form 8-K Item 5.07, in which the company reports its own meeting results. Shares outstanding are taken from TESLA INC.’s 10-Q dated March 31, 2024. This page is a static snapshot rebuilt weekly on October 25, 2026; a live search always shows the current data.

At TESLA INC.'s shareholder meeting held June 13, 2024, in the 2023-2024 proxy season, 1,404 asset managers reported how they voted on 13 ballot items in their SEC Form N-PX filings, covering 17,083 separate fund positions. On the most widely held item on that ballot — A Tesla proposal to approve executive compensation on a non- binding advisory basis. — TESLA INC.'s filing reports the proposal as approved, with 80% support of the votes cast (FOR divided by FOR plus AGAINST, the conventional basis for proxy support; abstentions, broker non-votes and unvoted shares are excluded because none of them took a side). Source: TESLA INC.'s Form 8-K, Item 5.07, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2024.

TESLA INC. proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2025-2026.

Download data (CSV): ballot items · votes by manager · column guide.