KERING SA 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

The 77 asset managers below reported 13,718,613 for, 649,777 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 14,332,430 for, 35,960 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 13,484,729 for, 883,661 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 14,332,430 for, 35,960 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 12,572,641 for, 1,795,749 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 21 asset managers below reported 2,152,362 for, 40,529 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 21 asset managers below reported 2,192,891 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 21 asset managers below reported 2,128,163 for, 64,728 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 77 asset managers below reported 11,693,663 for, 2,675,566 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 21 asset managers below reported 1,657,241 for, 535,650 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 76 managers: 14,368,252 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 201,813 for.

The 21 asset managers below reported 2,191,909 for, 982 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: AUTHORISATION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO PROCEED WITH THE FREE ALLOTMENT OF COMMON SHARES OF THE COMPANY, WHETHER EXISTING OR TO BE ISSUED, SUBJECT, WHERE APPLICABLE, TO PERFORMANCE CONDITIONS, FOR THE BENEFIT OF EMPLOYEES AND EXECUTIVE CORPORATE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY AND RELATED COMPANIES, OR CERTAIN CATEGORIES AMONG THEM, ENTAILING WAIVER BY SHAREHOLDERS OF THEIR PRE- EMPTIVE RIGHT TO SUBSCRIBE FOR SHARES TO BE ISSUED

The 21 asset managers below reported 1,629,028 for, 563,863 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO DECIDE ON A SHARE CAPITAL INCREASE BY ISSUING COMMON SHARES RESERVED FOR SPECIFIED CATEGORIES OF BENEFICIARIES, WITH CANCELLATION OF THE SHAREHOLDERS' PRE-EMPTIVE SUBSCRIPTION RIGHT IN FAVOUR OF THE LATTER (TO BE USED OUTSIDE PERIODS OF PUBLIC OFFERINGS)

The 21 asset managers below reported 2,192,891 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 77 asset managers below reported 14,368,452 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 14,368,381 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 14,368,381 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 21 asset managers below reported 2,192,891 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 21 asset managers below reported 2,192,891 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 21 asset managers below reported 2,192,891 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 76 asset managers below reported 14,328,745 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 76 asset managers. See all 76 in the interactive database.

The 21 asset managers below reported 2,192,891 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 76 managers: 14,298,039 for, 70,213 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 209,199 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 76 managers: 14,298,039 for, 70,213 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 209,199 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 76 managers: 9,051,327 for, 5,316,925 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 3,998,700 for.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVAL OF THE INFORMATION REFERRED TO IN SECTION I OF ARTICLE L. 22-10-9 OF THE FRENCH COMMERCIAL CODE RELATING TO THE REMUNERATIONS PAID DURING OR AWARDED IN RESPECT OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2023 TO CORPORATE OFFICERS

The 21 asset managers below reported 2,191,909 for, 982 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO DECIDE ON A SHARE CAPITAL INCREASE BY ISSUING, WITHOUT THE PRE- EMPTIVE SUBSCRIPTION RIGHT, COMMON SHARES RESERVED FOR EMPLOYEES, AND ELIGIBLE FORMER EMPLOYEES AND CORPORATE OFFICERS, MEMBERS OF A COMPANY SAVINGS PLAN (TO BE USED OUTSIDE PERIODS OF PUBLIC OFFERINGS)

The 21 asset managers below reported 2,192,891 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 75 managers: 14,163,925 for, 204,326 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 5 managers: 4,394,439 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 75 managers: 14,298,038 for, 70,213 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 5 managers: 4,394,439 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 75 managers: 14,368,251 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 3,998,968 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 76 managers: 14,368,025 for, 227 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 3,998,700 against.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 76 managers: 14,234,139 for, 134,113 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 3,998,700 for.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVAL OF THE FIXED, VARIABLE AND EXCEPTIONAL ELEMENTS MAKING UP THE TOTAL REMUNERATION AND BENEFITS OF ANY KIND PAID DURING OR AWARDED IN RESPECT OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2023 TO MR. FRANCOIS- HENRI PINAULT, IN HIS CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 21 managers: 2,159,200 for, 33,691 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 17 managers: 3,957,959 for, 113,140 against, 3,632 abstained, 105,699 not voted.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVAL OF THE FIXED, VARIABLE AND EXCEPTIONAL ELEMENTS MAKING UP THE TOTAL REMUNERATION AND BENEFITS OF ANY KIND PAID DURING OR AWARDED IN RESPECT OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2023 TO MR. JEAN-FRANCOIS PALUS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNTIL 3 OCTOBER 2023

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 21 managers: 2,191,909 for, 982 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 17 managers: 3,996,910 for, 74,189 against, 3,632 abstained, 105,699 not voted.

The 23 asset managers below reported 2,195,891 for, 3,632 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

The 23 asset managers below reported 2,162,200 for, 33,691 against, 3,632 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 76 managers: 14,368,252 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1 managers: 1,672,395 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.