Heritage Commerce Corp 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: A proposal to approve the principal terms of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Merger, dated as of December 17, 2025, by and between Heritage Commerce Corp ("Heritage") and CVB Financial Corp ("CVBF") (the "merger agreement"), and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger of Heritage with and into CVBF and the cancellation of each outstanding share of Heritage common stock, other than excluded shares, in exchange for the right to receive 0.65 shares of CVBF common stock (the "Heritage merger proposal").

Heritage Commerce Corp’s own tally for this item (“1. Merger Proposal The proposal to approve the principal terms of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger of Heritage with and into CVBF and the cancellation of each outstandi”): 42,403,674 for, 114,518 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed March 27, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1: Merger Proposal The proposal to approve the principal terms of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger of Heritage with and into CVBF and the cancellation of each outstanding share of Heritage common stock, other than excluded shares, in exch…”
Support: 99.7% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 67 asset managers below reported 15,886,849 for, 243,810 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 67 asset managers. See all 67 in the interactive database.

The 2 asset managers below reported 832,015 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: A proposal to adjourn the Heritage special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if, immediately prior to such adjournment, there are not sufficient votes to approve the Heritage merger proposal or to ensure that any supplement or amendment to the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus is timely provided to Heritage shareholders (the "Heritage adjournment proposal").

Heritage Commerce Corp’s own tally for this item (“3. Adjournment Proposal The proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if, immediately prior to such adjournment, there are not sufficient votes to approve the mer”): 40,827,731 for, 1,152,394 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed March 27, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 3: Adjournment Proposal The proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if, immediately prior to such adjournment, there are not sufficient votes to approve the merger proposal or to ensure that any supplement or amendment to the Join…”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 69 asset managers below reported 16,665,674 for, 296,999 against, 1 abstained.

Showing the 25 largest of 69 asset managers. See all 69 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: A proposal to approve, on a non- binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Heritage's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement (the "Heritage compensation proposal").

Heritage Commerce Corp’s own tally for this item (“2. Merger-Related Compensation Proposal The proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Heritage's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise ”): 32,622,919 for, 9,219,597 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed March 27, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 2: Merger-Related Compensation Proposal The proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to Heritage's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, was …”
Support: 78% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 67 managers: 13,052,786 for, 3,077,872 against, 1 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 179 managers: 17,195,231 for, 5,680,356 against, 3,016 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

The 6 asset managers below reported 67,432 for, 769,065 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.