Flushing Financial Corporation 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: A proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 29, 2025, by and among Flushing, OceanFirst Financial Corp., a Delaware corporation ("OceanFirst"), and Apollo Merger Sub Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of OceanFirst ("Merger Sub") (as such agreement may be amended from time to time, the "merger agreement"), a copy of which is attached as Annex A to the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus, which provides that, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Flushing (the "first merger"), with Flushing surviving the first merger, and, immediately following the first merger, Flushing will merge with and into OceanFirst (the "second merger," and together with the first merger, the "mergers"), with OceanFirst surviving the second merger. Upon consummation of the first merger, each share of Flushing common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the first merger, subject to certain exceptions, will be converted into the right to receive 0.85 of a share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of OceanFirst ("OceanFirst common stock"), as well as cash in lieu of fractional shares of OceanFirst common stock (the "Flushing merger proposal")

Flushing Financial Corporation’s own tally for this item (“1. Flushing Merger Proposal”): 24,102,136 for, 628,640 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed April 7, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Proposal 1: Flushing Merger Proposal”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 62 asset managers below reported 8,182,702 for, 1 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 62 asset managers. See all 62 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: A proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the Flushing special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including adjournments to permit further solicitation of proxies in favor of the Flushing merger proposal (the "Flushing adjournment proposal")

The 59 asset managers below reported 8,106,281 for, 71,337 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 59 asset managers. See all 59 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE ONE OR MORE ADJOURNMENTS OF THE FLUSHING SPECIAL MEETING, IF NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE, INCLUDING ADJOURNMENTS TO PERMIT FURTHER SOLICITATION OF PROXIES IN FAVOR OF THE FLUSHING MERGER PROPOSAL (THE FLUSHING ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL") "

The 2 asset managers below reported 166 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: A proposal to approve, on a non- binding, advisory basis, the compensation that Flushing's named executive officers may receive in connection with the mergers pursuant to agreements or arrangements with Flushing (the "Flushing compensation proposal")

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 59 managers: 3,582,955 for, 4,594,664 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 127 managers: 5,348,317 for, 6,811,241 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: A PROPOSAL TO APPROVE, ON A NON-BINDING, ADVISORY BASIS, THE COMPENSATION THAT FLUSHING'S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS MAY RECEIVE IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGERS PURSUANT TO AGREEMENTS OR ARRANGEMENTS WITH FLUSHING (THE FLUSHING COMPENSATION PROPOSAL") "

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 2 managers: 166 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 171 against.