Ennis, Inc. 2024-2025 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Alejandro Quiroz

Ennis, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Alejandro Quiroz”): 18,942,142 for, 403,333 against, per its Form 8-K filed July 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “There were 25,984,014 eligible votes, with 22,571,283 votes being cast, or 86.9%. b) Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A; there was no solicitation in opposition to management's nominees for directors listed in the Proxy Statement and all such nominees were elected.”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 63 asset managers below reported 11,265,704 for, 44,904 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 63 asset managers. See all 63 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Margaret A. Walters

Ennis, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Margaret A. Walters”): 18,443,095 for, 893,664 against, per its Form 8-K filed July 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “There were 25,984,014 eligible votes, with 22,571,283 votes being cast, or 86.9%. b) Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A; there was no solicitation in opposition to management's nominees for directors listed in the Proxy Statement and all such nominees were elected.”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 63 asset managers below reported 11,226,816 for, 83,792 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 63 asset managers. See all 63 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Troy L. Priddy

Ennis, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Troy L. Priddy”): 16,458,087 for, 2,884,962 against, per its Form 8-K filed July 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “There were 25,984,014 eligible votes, with 22,571,283 votes being cast, or 86.9%. b) Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A; there was no solicitation in opposition to management's nominees for directors listed in the Proxy Statement and all such nominees were elected.”
Support: 85% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 63 asset managers below reported 10,152,700 for, 1,157,908 against.

Showing the 25 largest of 63 asset managers. See all 63 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Non-binding advisory approval of Company's compensation of its named executive officers.

Ennis, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“3. To approve a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation”): 18,330,114 for, 934,093 against, per its Form 8-K filed July 18, 2024 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Ennis, Inc.’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Advisory Vote to Ratify Named Executive Officers' Compensation” (4 managers, Fund and manager reports combined; may count the same shares twice; no share total shown).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 61 managers: 11,043,610 for, 251,221 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 133 managers: 8,217,126 for, 602,514 against, 28,810 abstained, 284 not voted, 208 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

The 61 asset managers below reported 11,294,831 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 61 asset managers. See all 61 in the interactive database.