ENNIS INC. 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Aaron Carter

ENNIS INC.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Aaron Carter”): 16,050,801 for, 3,252,957 against, per its Form 8-K filed July 14, 2023 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “There were 25,853,027 eligible votes, with 22,429,202 votes being cast, or 86.8%. b) Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A; there was no solicitation in opposition to management’s nominees for directors listed in the Proxy Statement and all such nominees were elected.”
Support: 83% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 64 asset managers below reported 10,124,082 for, 1,481,380 against, 495 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 64 asset managers. See all 64 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Gary S. Mozina

ENNIS INC.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Gary S. Mozina”): 18,326,294 for, 977,155 against, per its Form 8-K filed July 14, 2023 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “There were 25,853,027 eligible votes, with 22,429,202 votes being cast, or 86.8%. b) Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A; there was no solicitation in opposition to management’s nominees for directors listed in the Proxy Statement and all such nominees were elected.”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 64 asset managers below reported 11,508,949 for, 96,513 against, 495 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 64 asset managers. See all 64 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: Keith S. Walters

ENNIS INC.’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Keith S. Walters”): 18,940,008 for, 363,743 against, per its Form 8-K filed July 14, 2023 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “There were 25,853,027 eligible votes, with 22,429,202 votes being cast, or 86.8%. b) Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A; there was no solicitation in opposition to management’s nominees for directors listed in the Proxy Statement and all such nominees were elected.”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 64 asset managers below reported 11,597,273 for, 8,189 against, 495 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 64 asset managers. See all 64 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: NON-BINDING ADVISORY APPROVAL OF COMPANY'S COMPENSATION OF ITS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

ENNIS INC.’s own tally for this item (“3. To approve a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation”): 18,396,726 for, 790,197 against, per its Form 8-K filed July 14, 2023 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of ENNIS INC.’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “ADVISORY VOTE TO RATIFY NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS' COMPENSATION” (5 managers, Fund and manager reports combined; may count the same shares twice; no share total shown).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 61 managers: 11,412,174 for, 182,697 against, 495 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 119 managers: 7,501,472 for, 380,760 against, 30,710 abstained, 44,475 1 year. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 61 managers: 9,496,016 1 year, 2,056,855 3 year, 495 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 115 managers: 45,049 for, 30 against, 4 withheld, 24,160 abstained, 20,765 not voted, 7,479,349 1 year, 358,490 3 year, 400 2 year, 208 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

The 61 asset managers below reported 11,594,871 for, 495 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 61 asset managers. See all 61 in the interactive database.