Eastman Chemical Company 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Elect Directors: Nominees for election of eleven directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2027 and their successors are duly elected and qualified: HUMBERTO P. ALFONSO

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Humberto P. Alfonso”): 86,574,085 for, 3,721,684 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the voting on the election of directors were as follows: Accordingly, each of the eleven nominees received a majority of votes cast in favor of that director's election and was elected.”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 47,223,201 for, 8,266 against, 11,760 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Directors: Nominees for election of eleven directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2027 and their successors are duly elected and qualified: DAMON J. AUDIA

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Damon J. Audia”): 89,949,795 for, 344,446 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the voting on the election of directors were as follows: Accordingly, each of the eleven nominees received a majority of votes cast in favor of that director's election and was elected.”
Support: 99.6% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 47,231,463 for, 3 against, 11,760 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Directors: Nominees for election of eleven directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2027 and their successors are duly elected and qualified: BRETT D. BEGEMANN

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Brett D. Begemann”): 85,780,518 for, 4,534,791 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the voting on the election of directors were as follows: Accordingly, each of the eleven nominees received a majority of votes cast in favor of that director's election and was elected.”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 47,180,563 for, 50,903 against, 11,760 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Directors: Nominees for election of eleven directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2027 and their successors are duly elected and qualified: ERIC L. BUTLER

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Eric L. Butler”): 89,454,490 for, 855,441 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the voting on the election of directors were as follows: Accordingly, each of the eleven nominees received a majority of votes cast in favor of that director's election and was elected.”
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 47,178,900 for, 50,397 against, 13,928 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Directors: Nominees for election of eleven directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2027 and their successors are duly elected and qualified: MARK J. COSTA

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Mark J. Costa”): 86,014,316 for, 4,291,824 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the voting on the election of directors were as follows: Accordingly, each of the eleven nominees received a majority of votes cast in favor of that director's election and was elected.”
Support: 95% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 47,138,881 for, 90,417 against, 13,928 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Directors: Nominees for election of eleven directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2027 and their successors are duly elected and qualified: LINNIE M. HAYNESWORTH

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Linnie M. Haynesworth”): 89,759,261 for, 559,329 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the voting on the election of directors were as follows: Accordingly, each of the eleven nominees received a majority of votes cast in favor of that director's election and was elected.”
Support: 99.3% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 47,231,462 for, 4 against, 11,760 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Directors: Nominees for election of eleven directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2027 and their successors are duly elected and qualified: JULIE F. HOLDER

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Julie F. Holder”): 82,207,815 for, 8,114,787 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the voting on the election of directors were as follows: Accordingly, each of the eleven nominees received a majority of votes cast in favor of that director's election and was elected.”
Support: 91% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 46,666,147 for, 565,318 against, 11,760 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Directors: Nominees for election of eleven directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2027 and their successors are duly elected and qualified: RENEE J. HORNBAKER

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Renée J. Hornbaker”): 86,314,362 for, 4,007,136 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the voting on the election of directors were as follows: Accordingly, each of the eleven nominees received a majority of votes cast in favor of that director's election and was elected.”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 47,182,962 for, 48,504 against, 11,760 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Directors: Nominees for election of eleven directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2027 and their successors are duly elected and qualified: KIM ANN MINK

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Kim Ann Mink”): 87,902,915 for, 2,396,876 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the voting on the election of directors were as follows: Accordingly, each of the eleven nominees received a majority of votes cast in favor of that director's election and was elected.”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 47,138,653 for, 90,643 against, 13,928 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Directors: Nominees for election of eleven directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2027 and their successors are duly elected and qualified: JAMES J. O'BRIEN

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: James J. O'Brien”): 87,179,492 for, 3,114,040 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the voting on the election of directors were as follows: Accordingly, each of the eleven nominees received a majority of votes cast in favor of that director's election and was elected.”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 47,180,669 for, 50,795 against, 11,760 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Directors: Nominees for election of eleven directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2027 and their successors are duly elected and qualified: DONALD W. SLAGER

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: Donald W. Slager”): 89,954,694 for, 358,034 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “The results of the voting on the election of directors were as follows: Accordingly, each of the eleven nominees received a majority of votes cast in favor of that director's election and was elected.”
Support: 99.6% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 95 asset managers below reported 47,231,463 for, 3 against, 11,760 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 95 asset managers. See all 95 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of the 2026 Omnibus Stock Compensation Plan

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“4. The results of the voting on the 2026 Omnibus Stock Compensation Plan”): 80,737,425 for, 9,464,242 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 90% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the votes cast (“majority of votes cast”).

The 107 asset managers below reported 44,047,295 for, 3,204,857 against, 1 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 107 asset managers. See all 107 in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 93 managers: 43,119,764 for, 4,036,257 against, 11,762 abstained, 98 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 534 managers: 37,828,779 for, 11,440,447 against, 27 abstained, 8,859 not voted, 45 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Say on Pay

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“3. The results of the voting on the advisory "say-on-pay" vote”): 69,669,114 for, 20,478,706 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 77% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the votes cast (“majority of votes cast”).

The 3 asset managers below reported 87,527 for, 977,599 against.

Description as filed by funds: Ratify Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year Ending December 31, 2026

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“2. The results of the voting on the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for 2026”): 96,146,277 for, 4,386,005 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Accordingly, a majority of votes cast on the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm were in favor of the proposal and the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was ratified.”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the votes cast (“majority of votes cast”).

The 96 asset managers below reported 47,159,691 for, 72,479 against, 11,760 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 96 asset managers. See all 96 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Advisory Vote on Stockholder Proposal Regarding Lowering the Threshold for Calling Special Shareholder Meetings to 10%

Eastman Chemical Company’s own tally for this item (“5. The results of the voting on the advisory stockholder proposal regarding lowering the threshold for calling special shareholder meetings to 10%”): 25,178,875 for, 64,930,702 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “Accordingly, a majority of votes cast on this stockholder proposal were not in favor of the advisory proposal and the proposal was not adopted.”
Support: 28% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the votes cast (“majority of votes cast”).

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Eastman Chemical Company’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Reduce Ownership Threshold for Shareholders to Call Special Meeting to 10%” (3 managers, 92,896 for).

The 94 asset managers below reported 3,633,640 for, 43,484,301 against, 32,574 abstained, 94 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 94 asset managers. See all 94 in the interactive database.