COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE RICHEMONT SA 2024-2025 Proxy Voting Records

The 78 asset managers below reported 38,785,563 for, 30,784,476 against, 5,376 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,575,415 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 61,107,729 for, 377,108 against, 8,090,578 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 61,146,612 for, 8,428,803 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 63,520,344 for, 6,055,071 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,575,415 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 63,445,877 for, 6,129,538 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 63,520,344 for, 6,055,071 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 63,466,198 for, 6,109,217 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,575,415 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,318,523 for, 256,892 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 62,443,445 for, 7,131,970 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 60,052,808 for, 9,522,607 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 63,500,023 for, 6,075,392 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 63,016,646 for, 6,558,769 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,555,094 for, 20,321 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,427,465 for, 147,950 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,575,415 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 68,720,629 for, 854,786 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 63,520,287 for, 6,055,071 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 62,859,481 for, 6,715,877 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 63,349,931 for, 6,225,427 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 63,295,785 for, 6,279,573 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 63,263,042 for, 6,312,316 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 62,727,655 for, 6,847,703 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

The 32 asset managers below reported 14,375,771 for, 251,975 against, 700 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 32 asset managers. See all 32 in the interactive database.

The 32 asset managers below reported 14,627,746 for, 700 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 32 asset managers. See all 32 in the interactive database.

The 32 asset managers below reported 14,624,783 for, 2,963 against, 700 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 32 asset managers. See all 32 in the interactive database.

The 32 asset managers below reported 14,612,601 for, 15,145 against, 700 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 32 asset managers. See all 32 in the interactive database.

The 32 asset managers below reported 12,838,545 for, 1,789,201 against, 700 not voted. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 32 asset managers. See all 32 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,575,415 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approve Allocation of Income and Ordinary Dividends of CHF 2.75 per Registered A Share and CHF 0.275 per Registered B Share

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,575,415 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,575,415 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,394,039 for, 181,376 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 78 asset managers below reported 69,575,415 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 78 asset managers. See all 78 in the interactive database.

The 77 asset managers below reported 1,674,861 for, 67,772,122 against, 128,375 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 77 asset managers. See all 77 in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 77 managers: 69,503,944 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 3 managers: 1,955,450 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.