COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE RICHEMONT SA 2023-2024 Proxy Voting Records

The 111 asset managers below reported 74,691,693 for, 6,846,947 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 74,626,634 for, 6,912,006 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 81,401,502 for, 313,760 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 74,367,729 for, 7,347,533 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 75,401,592 for, 29,708 against, 5,743,288 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,162,252 for.

The 111 asset managers below reported 63,558,619 for, 17,980,021 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 56,388,161 for, 25,150,479 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 65,448,258 for, 16,090,382 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 65,463,096 for, 16,075,544 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 81,536,840 for, 178,422 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 81,715,262 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 74,855,373 for, 6,859,889 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 65,438,933 for, 16,276,329 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 74,624,834 for, 7,090,428 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 71,673,046 for, 10,042,216 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 81,174,588 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,162,252 for.

The 111 asset managers below reported 81,715,262 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 80,151,198 for, 1,023,390 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,162,252 for.

The 111 asset managers below reported 58,099,324 for, 23,615,938 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 74,855,373 for, 6,859,889 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 74,689,168 for, 7,026,094 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 81,523,898 for, 191,364 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 81,536,840 for, 178,422 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 81,715,262 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

The 111 asset managers below reported 67,391,814 for, 14,323,448 against. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 111 asset managers. See all 111 in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 80,860,828 for, 313,760 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,647,374 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 55,506,363 for, 25,668,225 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,285,122 for, 362,252 against.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 81,174,588 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,647,374 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 81,174,588 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,647,374 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 81,174,588 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,647,374 for.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVE ALLOCATION OF INCOME AND ORDINARY DIVIDENDS OF CHF 2.50 PER REGISTERED A SHARE AND CHF 0.25 PER REGISTERED B SHARE AND A SPECIAL DIVIDEND OF CHF 1.00 PER REGISTERED A SHARE AND CHF 0.10 PER REGISTERED B SHARE

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 81,174,588 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 8,624,468 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 81,174,403 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 13,637,982 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 81,174,588 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,647,374 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 80,213,375 for, 961,213 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,647,374 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 108 managers: 81,174,588 for. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,647,374 for.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 87 managers: 595,562 for, 67,434,375 against, 9,101,690 abstained. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 1,285,122 for, 362,252 against.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.