City Office REIT, Inc. 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: To approve the merger of the Company with and into MCME Carell Merger Sub, LLC, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 23, 2025, by and among the Company, MCME Carell Holdings, LP ("Parent"), a Delaware limited partnership, and MCME Carell Merger Sub, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the "Merger Proposal");

The 45 asset managers below reported 6,871,489 for, 54,900 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 45 asset managers. See all 45 in the interactive database.

The 3 asset managers below reported 118,613 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve any adjournment of the Special Meeting to a later date, if necessary, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the Special Meeting to approve the Merger Proposal (the "Adjournment Proposal").

The 45 asset managers below reported 6,820,985 for, 50,636 against, 54,900 abstained. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 45 asset managers. See all 45 in the interactive database.

The 3 asset managers below reported 118,613 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Description as filed by funds: To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to our named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger (the "Advisory Compensation Proposal");

City Office REIT, Inc.’s own tally for this item (“Advisory Compensation Proposal”): 11,281,397 for, 14,895,213 against — failed, per its Form 8-K filed October 17, 2025 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Not approved, in the filing’s own words: “Advisory Compensation Proposal At the Special Meeting, the Advisory Compensation Proposal was not approved, having not received "for" votes from a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the Special Meeting.”
Support: 43% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.
Voting standard, as the filing states it: a majority of the votes cast (“majority of the votes cast”).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 45 managers: 414,943 for, 6,511,578 against. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 136 managers: 6,735,820 for, 9,152,779 against, 326,625 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice). The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Fund voting reports, all 3 managers: 118,613 against.

Institutional-manager reports, all 2 managers: 27,775 against.