Home › Asset managers › Compare 2025-2026 › Goldman Sachs vs Prudential/PGIM

Goldman Sachs vs Prudential/PGIM: how alike they voted, 2025-2026

93.1% When both took a single position, they voted the same way on 93.1% of 25,197 items (23,454 the same, 1,743 different). 1,488 items where at least one of them split its funds are listed separately below. Both voted on 26,685 items in all.

Goldman Sachs 2025-2026 · Prudential/PGIM 2025-2026 · Download the item list (CSV)

By who put the item on the ballot. “Same position” = Same / (Same + Differ); split items are not in it. “Fund-level” is a second view over all common items: the chance that a fund of each manager, picked at random, voted the same way, which gives partial credit where a manager split.
	Common items	Same	Differ	Split (not in %)	Same position	Fund-level
All ballot items	26,685	23,454	1,743	1,488	93.1%	90.6%
Board proposals	24,177	21,285	1,616	1,276	92.9%	90.6%
E&S shareholder proposals	171	134	3	34	97.8%	88.1%
Other items	2,337	2,035	124	178	94.3%	90.1%

Where they did not vote alike

Everything Voted differently Split votes

All ballot items Board proposals E&S shareholder proposals Other items

302 items. “Voted differently”: each manager’s funds all voted one way, and the two ways differ. “Split”: at least one manager’s funds did not all vote the same way.

Company	Meeting	Proposal	On the ballot from	Board recommended	Goldman Sachs	Prudential/PGIM
WORKDAY, INC.	June 16, 2026	To consider and vote upon a stockholder proposal regarding disclosure of voting results based on share class. Shareholder Rights and Defenses	Other	Against	FOR 10 funds	Split 4 FOR, 1 AGAINST
ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC.	May 22, 2026	Shareholder Proposal on Independent Board Chairman. Corporate Governance	Other	Against	AGAINST 8 funds	Split 5 FOR, 1 AGAINST

← All 20 managers, 2025-2026

How items are matched and positions counted: see the comparison table and the methodology. Built November 1, 2026 from SEC Form N-PX filings.