proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Goldman Sachs › 2025-2026

Goldman Sachs proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Goldman Sachs reported 326,062 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 240,212 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 94.3% of the time. On the 2,372 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 0.0% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

94.3% FOR of 240,212 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 226,402 AGAINST 12,133 Abstained or withheld 1,677

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

0.0% FOR of 2,372 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 2,359.

FOR 0 AGAINST 2,372 Abstained 0

See the 0 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Goldman Sachs, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (1,783 inferred) 142,913 140,780 96.7% 3.3% 1,662
Director Elections Shareholders (21 inferred) 55 21 14.3% 85.7% 34
Corporate Governance Board (1 inferred) 49,944 49,808 85.0% 15.0% 102
Corporate Governance Shareholders (39 inferred) 3,464 3,443 24.2% 75.8% 10
Capital Structure Board 29,661 29,647 92.2% 7.8% 8
Capital Structure Shareholders (9 inferred) 323 323 78.9% 21.1% 0
Compensation Board (437 inferred) 25,986 25,934 87.5% 12.5% 30
Compensation Shareholders (14 inferred) 325 313 31.9% 68.1% 0
Audit-related Board 22,897 22,884 97.9% 2.1% 4
Audit-related Shareholders (21 inferred) 158 150 73.3% 26.7% 8
Say-on-Pay Board (3,578 inferred) 19,938 18,296 94.4% 5.6% 2
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (24 inferred) 27 27 100.0% 0.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 3,624 3,622 77.9% 22.1% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 217 217 25.8% 74.2% 0
Other Social Issues Board 1,212 1,212 88.0% 12.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,741 1,733 0.1% 99.9% 0
Other Board 2,524 2,487 66.1% 33.9% 37
Other Shareholders 264 264 48.1% 51.9% 0
Environment or Climate Board 535 535 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,414 1,408 0.0% 100.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 454 454 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 665 665 0.0% 100.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 454 454 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 532 530 0.0% 100.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 547 525 95.4% 4.6% 21
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (5 inferred) 285 284 56.7% 43.3% 1
Investment Company Matters Board 13 13 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 35 35 88.6% 11.4% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (5,932 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Goldman Sachs broke with the board (6,000 distinct proposals) →

What Goldman Sachs said it would do

The page above is what Goldman Sachs did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Goldman Sachs AM, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Goldman Sachs filed 326,062 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 297,743 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 8,545 issuer names and 86 funds. They cover 94,095 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
2,223 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted22 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,516 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate1 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote684 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Goldman Sachs proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).