Home › Asset managers › Compare 2025-2026 › Dimensional vs Prudential/PGIM

Dimensional vs Prudential/PGIM: how alike they voted, 2025-2026

97.1% When both took a single position, they voted the same way on 97.1% of 22,485 items (21,822 the same, 663 different). 1,154 items where at least one of them split its funds are listed separately below. Both voted on 23,639 items in all.

Dimensional 2025-2026 · Prudential/PGIM 2025-2026 · Download the item list (CSV)

By who put the item on the ballot. “Same position” = Same / (Same + Differ); split items are not in it. “Fund-level” is a second view over all common items: the chance that a fund of each manager, picked at random, voted the same way, which gives partial credit where a manager split.
	Common items	Same	Differ	Split (not in %)	Same position	Fund-level
All ballot items	23,639	21,822	663	1,154	97.1%	94.3%
Board proposals	21,891	20,372	575	944	97.3%	94.8%
E&S shareholder proposals	173	114	2	57	98.3%	86.2%
Other items	1,575	1,336	86	153	94.0%	88.2%

Where they did not vote alike

Everything Voted differently Split votes

All ballot items Board proposals E&S shareholder proposals Other items

2 items. “Voted differently”: each manager’s funds all voted one way, and the two ways differ. “Split”: at least one manager’s funds did not all vote the same way.

Company	Meeting	Proposal	On the ballot from	Board recommended	Dimensional	Prudential/PGIM
FASTENAL COMPANY	April 23, 2026	Shareholder proposal relating to an EEO-1 reporting disclosure policy, if properly presented at the annual meeting. Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce	Shareholder (E&S)	None	AGAINST 6 funds	FOR 5 funds
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.	May 5, 2026	Shareholder Proposal Regarding Political Spending. Other Social Issues	Shareholder (E&S)	Against	AGAINST 6 funds	FOR 5 funds

← All 20 managers, 2025-2026

How items are matched and positions counted: see the comparison table and the methodology. Built October 13, 2026 from SEC Form N-PX filings.