proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Dimensional › 2025-2026

Dimensional proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Dimensional reported 681,034 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 471,252 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 86.5% of the time. On the 1,097 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 3.2% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

86.5% FOR of 471,252 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 407,849 AGAINST 47,960 Abstained or withheld 15,443

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

3.2% FOR of 1,097 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,091.

FOR 35 AGAINST 1,062 Abstained 0

See the 35 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Dimensional, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (8,848 inferred) 239,603 223,038 94.3% 5.7% 15,470
Director Elections Shareholders (191 inferred) 241 204 7.8% 92.2% 37
Corporate Governance Board (4 inferred) 164,018 163,676 70.8% 29.2% 246
Corporate Governance Shareholders (40 inferred) 3,842 3,812 31.5% 68.5% 24
Capital Structure Board 101,537 101,522 88.1% 11.9% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders (4 inferred) 807 806 77.9% 22.1% 1
Compensation Board (1,873 inferred) 72,910 72,808 81.2% 18.8% 95
Compensation Shareholders (172 inferred) 832 827 41.7% 58.3% 0
Audit-related Board 38,290 38,286 95.7% 4.3% 4
Audit-related Shareholders (6 inferred) 298 274 71.2% 28.8% 24
Say-on-Pay Board (3,140 inferred) 19,769 18,066 78.8% 21.2% 2
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (7 inferred) 7 7 100.0% 0.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 13,463 13,463 62.8% 37.2% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (2 inferred) 719 719 47.6% 52.4% 0
Other Board 6,678 6,396 92.9% 7.1% 282
Other Shareholders 523 523 55.3% 44.7% 0
Other Social Issues Board 1,642 1,642 90.9% 9.1% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 845 844 1.9% 98.1% 0
Environment or Climate Board 735 735 86.0% 14.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 851 851 3.5% 96.5% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 1,243 1,183 75.2% 24.8% 60
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (5 inferred) 167 167 74.9% 25.1% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 632 632 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 308 308 1.9% 98.1% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 632 632 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 250 250 3.2% 96.8% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 223 223 87.4% 12.6% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (14,292 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Dimensional broke with the board (6,035 distinct proposals) →

What Dimensional said it would do

The page above is what Dimensional did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Dimensional, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Dimensional filed 681,034 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 633,406 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 13,721 issuer names and 34 funds. They cover 169,670 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
2,925 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type1,701 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote1,224 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Dimensional proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).