proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › PRAXIS MUTUAL FUNDS › 2023-2024

PRAXIS MUTUAL FUNDS proxy voting record, 2023-2024

PRAXIS MUTUAL FUNDS reported 18,263 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 14,102 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 83.7% of the time. On the 383 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 67.1% of the time.

2023-2024

On the board’s own proposals

83.7% FOR of 14,102 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 11,809 AGAINST 1,848 Abstained or withheld 445

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

67.1% FOR of 383 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 321.

FOR 257 AGAINST 126 Abstained 1

See the 257 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

PRAXIS MUTUAL FUNDS, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (34 inferred) 9,628 9,136 88.3% 11.7% 442
Director Elections Shareholders 23 11 100.0% 0.0% 12
Corporate Governance Board 1,656 1,652 93.6% 6.4% 3
Corporate Governance Shareholders (1 inferred) 192 191 72.3% 27.7% 1
Compensation Board (20 inferred) 1,363 1,360 89.0% 11.0% 3
Compensation Shareholders 66 66 47.0% 53.0% 0
Audit-related Board 1,230 1,230 95.7% 4.3% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (1 inferred) 15 14 85.7% 14.3% 1
Say-on-Pay Board 1,085 938 44.0% 56.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (2 inferred) 2 1 0.0% 100.0% 0
Capital Structure Board 1,011 1,011 93.2% 6.8% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 15 15 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 66 66 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 234 233 60.1% 39.9% 1
Environment or Climate Board 38 38 92.1% 7.9% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 181 181 49.2% 50.8% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 30 30 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 107 107 45.8% 54.2% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 30 30 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 86 86 70.9% 29.1% 0
Other Board 65 64 96.9% 3.1% 1
Other Shareholders 20 20 10.0% 90.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 73 73 89.0% 11.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 40 39 89.7% 10.3% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 11 11 72.7% 27.3% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 5 5 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (58 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where PRAXIS MUTUAL FUNDS broke with the board (2,294 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
PRAXIS MUTUAL FUNDS filed 18,263 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 16,565 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,242 issuer names and 5 funds. They cover 15,025 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
200 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type148 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote52 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 25, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

PRAXIS MUTUAL FUNDS proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page).