proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Nushares ETF Trust › 2023-2024

Nushares ETF Trust proxy voting record, 2023-2024

Nushares ETF Trust reported 21,385 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 16,299 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 94.7% of the time. On the 715 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 22.8% of the time.

2023-2024

On the board’s own proposals

94.7% FOR of 16,299 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 15,432 AGAINST 586 Abstained or withheld 281

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

22.8% FOR of 715 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 623.

FOR 163 AGAINST 552 Abstained 0

See the 163 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Nushares ETF Trust, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (36 inferred) 11,412 11,082 97.3% 2.7% 270
Director Elections Shareholders 15 1 0.0% 100.0% 14
Corporate Governance Board 1,972 1,951 92.0% 8.0% 14
Corporate Governance Shareholders (1 inferred) 249 249 28.5% 71.5% 0
Audit-related Board 1,542 1,542 99.9% 0.1% 0
Audit-related Shareholders 12 12 100.0% 0.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 1,512 1,320 90.9% 9.1% 1
Compensation Board (13 inferred) 1,231 1,217 89.1% 10.9% 13
Compensation Shareholders 86 86 8.1% 91.9% 0
Capital Structure Board 802 802 94.6% 5.4% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 29 29 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 45 45 91.1% 8.9% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 445 445 16.4% 83.6% 0
Environment or Climate Board 22 22 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 297 297 12.8% 87.2% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 20 20 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 199 199 19.6% 80.4% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 20 20 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 170 170 11.8% 88.2% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 118 118 94.1% 5.9% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 57 54 96.3% 3.7% 3
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 20 20 75.0% 25.0% 0
Other Board 60 60 91.7% 8.3% 0
Other Shareholders 3 3 33.3% 66.7% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (50 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Nushares ETF Trust broke with the board (853 distinct proposals) →

What Nushares ETF Trust said it would do

The page above is what Nushares ETF Trust did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Nuveen TIAA, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Nushares ETF Trust filed 21,385 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 19,413 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,295 issuer names and 16 funds. They cover 13,820 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
259 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type191 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote68 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Nushares ETF Trust proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page).