proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › NORTHERN LIGHTS FUND TRUST II › 2024-2025

NORTHERN LIGHTS FUND TRUST II proxy voting record, 2024-2025

NORTHERN LIGHTS FUND TRUST II reported 28,242 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 19,870 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 97.5% of the time. On the 306 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 10.1% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

97.5% FOR of 19,870 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 19,375 AGAINST 297 Abstained or withheld 198

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

10.1% FOR of 306 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 303.

FOR 31 AGAINST 275 Abstained 28

See the 31 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

NORTHERN LIGHTS FUND TRUST II, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (549 inferred) 15,047 14,552 98.8% 1.2% 180
Director Elections Shareholders (2 inferred) 2 2 50.0% 50.0% 0
Audit-related Board (69 inferred) 2,180 2,132 98.2% 1.8% 8
Audit-related Shareholders (2 inferred) 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 2,132 1,957 96.9% 3.1% 3
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (1 inferred) 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board (137 inferred) 704 660 95.5% 4.5% 34
Corporate Governance Shareholders (63 inferred) 287 272 25.0% 75.0% 12
Compensation Board (75 inferred) 724 702 96.6% 3.4% 8
Compensation Shareholders (16 inferred) 55 54 20.4% 79.6% 1
Capital Structure Board (6 inferred) 326 316 98.4% 1.6% 1
Capital Structure Shareholders (1 inferred) 3 2 100.0% 0.0% 1
Other Board 195 194 95.9% 4.1% 0
Other Shareholders (2 inferred) 2 2 0.0% 100.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board (5 inferred) 8 8 50.0% 50.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders (40 inferred) 155 137 6.6% 93.4% 10
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board (1 inferred) 74 68 100.0% 0.0% 6
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (17 inferred) 57 55 47.3% 52.7% 2
Environment or Climate Board (5 inferred) 5 3 0.0% 100.0% 2
Environment or Climate Shareholders (29 inferred) 116 101 11.9% 88.1% 10
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board (3 inferred) 3 3 0.0% 100.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders (17 inferred) 76 68 14.7% 85.3% 7
Extraordinary Transactions Board (2 inferred) 38 35 97.1% 2.9% 2
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders (2 inferred) 20 19 5.3% 94.7% 1

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (1,044 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where NORTHERN LIGHTS FUND TRUST II broke with the board (524 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
NORTHERN LIGHTS FUND TRUST II filed 28,242 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 21,992 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,641 issuer names and 20 funds. They cover 16,582 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
579 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted257 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type276 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote46 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 18, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

NORTHERN LIGHTS FUND TRUST II proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.